Answer: This could be a way to paraphrase it:
PARIS. You poor soul, your face has shed many tears.
JULIET. My tears have not benefited from it, since my face was already bad when I started to shed them.
PARIS. You are doing more wrong than the tears to your face by saying that.
JULIET. That is not a calumny, sir, but the truth. What I said, I said it to my face.
PARIS. That face is mine, and you have defamed it.
JULIET. That may be the case, because it is no longer mine.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that paraphrasing is formulating an original text in a different way, using alternative words. Since the original text in the example is a poem, you have to try to imitate it to the bext extent that you can, but without rendering it exactly—with the goal of making it more understandable to contemporary audiences. This is a passage from Act 4. Paris is talking to Juliet kindly and with affection, but also condescendingly, and Juliet is replying to him bluntly and with indifference.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
First, we are talking about the story "Everyday Use," written by African American writer Alice Walker in 1973. This story is included in the collection called "In Love and Trouble."
The characterization of the speaker could be the following. She is a strong character uneducated woman that works hard to maintain the family. She tells the story from her perspective, so she is not objective. The name of the character is simply "Mama."
Where does she refrain from making judgments? For instance, when her daughter asks her if she looks good. Mama evades the question asked by her daughter but later she -as the narrator- describes the way her daughter looks.
Where does she present less than the full truth? For example, when she refers to Wangero, the other daughter. She hides some truths and then later, she expresses what she really thinks about her daughter and how she does not agree with her decisions.
Do these examples of reticence undercut her reliability? No, she simply tells the story from her particular point of view.
Answer:
Romeo was in a melancholy mood when he came to the Capulet's home for a feast and this is because of the fair Rosaline who he fancies himself to be in love with. Coming to the Capulet's home despite the enmity between his family and theirs is a risk on its own, getting to meet Juliet and falling in love with her is the greatest risk to him.
If he didn't go for the feast he wouldn't have met Juliet and the tragedy would have been averted but fate has other plans for the two star crossed lovers.
He came to the feast for Rosaline but left with Juliet in his thoughts.
I would say B, it makes the most sense out of those
Answer:
- The missing pages in Dr. Yu Tsun's statement become an extended metaphor <u>that helps solve the mystery</u>.
Explanation:
The pretentious student of history continues to reveal his trump card. It's a statement or a type of oral declaration given by an observer to be utilized in a preliminary. For this situation, the affidavit is managed by a man named Dr. Yu Tsun, and the initial two pages are absent.
The remainder of the story is the testimony, told from the perspective of Dr. Yu Tsun. Since the initial two pages are "missing," we begin in mid-sentence.
