Answer:
B. Debit Vacation Benefits Expense $1,500; credit Vacation Benefits Payable $1,500
Explanation:
Lets consider all the other options to eliminate them from our choice
Option A: The entry provided debits the vacation benefits expenses and credits the prepaid vacation benefits. The liability for the vacation credit earned by the employees during the month needs to be recorded so this is not an adjustment of an advance vacation benefit.
Option C: The required entry has nothing to do with taxes so not relevant.
Option D: The entry is to record the liability for vacations earned by the employees so an expenses has to be recorded.
Option E: The option reduces the liability and reduces the expenses which is against the requirement of the question
Answer:
superseding cause
Explanation:
According to my research on different liability law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Iris will not be liable for this second set of injuries because the plane crash was a superseding cause. This refers to an accident that happens after another (initial accident) has already occurred in which an injury has happened. In this type of situation the person who caused the initial accident is not responsible for the second accident or injuries caused by it.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
c. in which people are presented with ambiguous images
Explanation:
The Thematic Apperception Test, also known as TAT, involves showing subjects ambiguous pictures and asking them to come up with an explanation for what is happening in the scene.
The way the test works is that subjects decipher or describe ambiguous situations based on their own past experiences and motivations in the form stories. This could either be conscious or subconscious. Subject usually lowers his/her guard to the examiner while describing the story. At this point, much-valuable information about the subject is being divulged.
Answer:
Present Value = $290.20
Explanation:
The present value of a future payment can be calculated with the following formula:
PV = FV / (1 + i)N
Where i is the annual interest rate or discount rate, and t is the number of years until the payment will be received.
PV = Present Value = ?
FV = Payment = $4,400
i = 8.3% = 0.083
N = 20 - 6 = 14
PV = $4400 / (1 + 0.083)(20 - 6)
PV = $4400 / (1.083 * 14)
PV = $4400 / 15.162
PV = $290.1992
Present Value = $290.20 (Approximated)
Explanation:
1. Ragged mountains assertion of defense is '<u>assumption of risk</u><u>'</u><u>.</u><u> </u>In this scenario, Elaine Sweeney exposed herself to risk while snow tubing at the absence of an instructor. snow tube run is solely for snow tubers. ragged mountain can use this defense
2. new hampshire has prohibited people from suing for injuries received due to skiing risks. in a case of this sort, ms Elaine would be assumed to know all possible risks involved. the defendant will be favored since it has been advised that people should not go into sports of these sorts witout good training and an instructor.
3. no Elaine's lawsuit will not be successful if the conclusion of the court is that the statue applies to skiing and not to snow tubing. one should be cautious during snow tubing. she went snow tubing without proper care. it is likely that she may not win the case.
4. the theory is <u>contributor</u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>neglige</u><u>nce</u><u> </u><u>theor</u><u>y</u><u>.</u><u> </u>her damages is going to be reduced in proportion with the actions that has brought about her accident. for this reason she is partly responsible.
