The correct answer is A) priming.
Daniel is headed out on a blind date. The friend who set him up told him that his date was valedictorian of her graduating class. As Daniel is talking with his date, he begins to question his own understanding of math when she tells him that 1+1=3. His perception that she is right, even though it goes against what he understands, is due to priming.
This phenomenon happens when one external stimulus is able to influence your perception of reality and makes you believe something although you cannot understand it, That is why Daniel started to question his own understanding of math when her date told him that 1+1=3. The effect of priming on a person can be circumstantial, momentary, or last for a while. According to scholars, priming can present itself in the following modalities: affective, negative, positive, and perceptual, and has a direct impact on the receiver.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"A psychology professor wants to know whether verbal ability is related to memory quality in current first-year students at her small college. Participants in the study (first-year students at her college) complete an online memory task. The students are first shown a list of 60 words. Next they are shown a list that includes five new words that are conceptually similar to words on the original list. Then they are asked to identify the words on the second list that appeared on the original list. She uses the percentage of new but conceptually similar words that were mistakenly thought to be on the original list as her measure of memory quality. She also asks the students to report several characteristics such as their age, gender, and verbal SAT score.
Which of the following are variables in the study? Check all that apply. The students' verbal SAT scores The students' percentage of words that were correctly recognized on the original list The number of students participating in the survey."
Answer:
The student's verbal SAT scores
The student's percentage of words that were correctly recongnized on the original list.
The number of students participating in the survey.
Explanation:
Within all scientific research, variables (dependent and independent) can be verified. These variables correspond to the number of factors that can take on value within the experiment and dissolve results for the research to be completed.
Accordingly, we can see that the variables of the experiment shown above are:
- The student's verbal score in the SAT: presents a value and shows the difference between the students allowing a comparison to be made.
- The percentage of words of the student that were correctly refilled in the original list: Also assumes a value and shows a result that is directly related to the veracity of the hypothesis of the study:
- The number of students who participated in the study: It also assumes a value and will allow calculations and graphs to be made to show the results.
<span>She is using the Jigsaw classroom technique. This technique was invented inthe early 1970's. It reduces racism, helps students achieve better grades and have more fun, which makes them like school more. It also forces student to learn about team work and cooperate with each other, since they need each other to study and learn</span>
Answer:
The answer is B
explanation
believing in yourself help push you harder. without the proper motivation you are nothing and can't do nothing. Taking yourself for granted only keeps you down and depress you. plus just because a person is saying someone is underestimating them does not mean they are self efficient. Self efficient people get things done and depend on them self. They are confident and successful. The worst crime you can commit against yourself is doubting and questioning yourself continuously.
Answer:
leader-member relations
Explanation:
The term "leader-member relations" is a part of the leader-member exchange theory or LMX, and is defined as a "relationship-based approach" to a different leadership style that is generally aimed at the two-way or dyadic relationship that exists between the followers and the leaders.
However, it explains the existing relationship between the employees and the manager in a particular workplace and the way they should interact with each other.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "leader-member relations".
