Answer:
<u>Jax</u> will pay for (his) lunch with cash today.
Explanation:
"His" is not a pronoun. It is a possessive adjective: my, your, his, her, its, our, your, their. It is called so because it precedes a noun and modifies it. Therefore, if you say "his" lunch, it is not about any lunch; it is rather a specific one, belonging to a particular person.
The antecedent of "his" is "Jax", since "his lunch" refers to "Jax's lunch", that is, Jax is the person whose lunch we are talking about.
Answer:
Both articles included information about the trouble the ship had when it first left harbor.
Explanation:
Answer:
This is an example of" individual vs self"conflict.
<span>Which poets address it in terms of the times they live in (and its threat of fascism) and which address it in a more personal way?
</span>
Answer: First we should know that both of these poet's had a bad experience in their lives, suffering similarly under tyranny and oppression during World War II, which shaped their perspective in very different ways. Milosz is the one that took it very personally and considered his life as emotionally destroyed while Szymborska looked at it as another chance at life that might never be given again. It is clear that the poet that addresses death in terms of the times they live in and as a threat of fascism is Milosz. This is apparent in the poem “City Without A Name”.
I hope this helps, Regards.
Stowe uses this dialogue between George and Haley to illustrate that slavery is unethical in every circumstance by showing that there are two parts involved who are equally as guilty for the problem.
George criticizes Haley for selling men and women but at the same time buys slaves himself. George knows that slavery is wrong and does not approve of it. However, he still participates and helps the system to keep standing by buying people to work for him.
With this, the author seeks to convey the idea that it is not only selling slaves that is unethical, but also buying them.
