This scientific law is called as Law of conservation of energy.
Sun is the primary source of energy .Energy once produced by the sun is then utilized by the organisms at various tropic levels. The energy is transferred from one organism to another. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. This is called as law of conservation of energy. Plants uses sunlight and make food and the energy is then transferred to organisms eating it. When the organism dies the energy is released into the environment. This cycle continues and the the law of conservation of energy is maintained.
They are capable of renewing and dividing (multiplying) themselves for long periods of time, they are unspecialized, and they can give rise to other specialized cell types. Hope this helps!! :)
Answer:
If 32 packed volume units of cells are separated from 46 volume units of plasma from a blood sample, the hematocrit is <u>41,02%</u> percent. The hematocrit value is <u>within the normal</u> range.
Explanation:
Hello!
Hematocrit (or packed cell volume -PCV-)is defined as the percentage of red blood cells (vol%) in a blood sample. One common method of determining it is by centrifuging a heparinized blood sample in a capillary tube at 10 000 RPM for five minutes. This separates the blood sample in two layers, formed elements (RBC and WBC) and Plasma.
The length of the layers is directly measured from the tube and represents the volume of packed cells and plasma. Since the number of white cells is negligible compared to the number of red cells, the formed elements are considered to represent the red blood cells.
The hematocrit can be calculated as the volume of packed cells divided by the total volume of the blood sample.
<u>In the question:</u>
= 
= 41,02%
In humans the normal hematocrit range is 40,7% to 50,3% for men and 36,1% to 44,3%. Taking these reference values into consideration, this sample is within the normal range.
I hope you have a SUPER day!
Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
