Answer:
D) readily available substitute products.
Explanation:
Porters five explains the following
- Threat of new entry
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Bargaining power of buyers
- Threat of substitution
A) lack of importance of the buyer to the supplier group.
True. Buyers have less bargaining power as compared to suppliers
B) high differentiation by the supplier.
True. Higher differentiation leads to competitive advantage and rivalry within the market.
C) dominance by a few suppliers.
True. This falls under threat of new entry as the fewer suppliers create barriers such as capital requirement and licensing requirements to prevent new entrants
D) readily available substitute products.
False. This means there are more suppliers in the market that are ready to substitute a product thus making suppliers less powerful.
Option A, Materiel Solution Analysis Phase
Explanation:
The equipment answer Analysis part assesses potential solutions for a required capability in associate Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) and to satisfy the phase-specific Entrance Criteria for ensuing program milestone selected by the Milestone call Authority.
The MSA phase is critical to program fulfilment and attaining materiel readiness because it’s the first possibility to persuade systems sup-portability and affordability by using balancing technology opportunities with operational and sustainment requirements. During this phase, various options are analysed to select the materiel solution and broaden the Technology Development Strategy (TDS) to fill any era gaps.
Answer:
281,281.28
Explanation:
expected cost 300,000 + 10,000 = 310,000
with an inerest rate of 10%
discount value equals to 281,281.28
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the equivalent units for direct material and conversion cost is shown below:
Physical units Direct Materials Conversion Cost
Beginning
Work in process
100% and 50% 250
Units Started 800
Total Units
Under process 1,050
Less : Ending
Work in process 150
Units Transferred
to TestingDepartment 900 900 900
Ending Work in process 150 150 112.50
(100% and 75%)
Equivalent units ofproduction 1,050 1,050 1,012.50
Answer:
The issues that arises between the Faraj and Siegel can be discussed by three different groups in resolving the contract agreement.
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of the complete question below.
Explanation:
Solution
In this case between Faraj and Siege'ls building contractors the following issue are discussed by three groups as follows:
(1) The contractor can increase the price of finishing construction based on inflation and the cost of raising materials during inflation prices for the materials increases or goes up and this will affect the customer gradually.
(2) Faraj will not pay the additional amount requested by Siegel because according to the contract the amount she has to pay is $153,000
(3) Issues or problems that might come up during construction is listed below:
- Poor communication
- Not feasible or impractical forecasting
- The unavailability of structure
