Answer:
In Pavlov's classic study on classical conditioning, the bell was the <u>neutral stimulus </u>before conditioning and the <u>conditioned stimulus</u> after conditioning had occurred (option C).
Explanation:
Classical conditioning, proposed by Ivan Pavlov, establishes that two stimuli -one unconditioned that produces a response and one neutral- when associated, convert the neutral stimulus into a conditioned one with a response.
Pavlov's famous dog experiment laid the foundations of classical conditioning:
- A dog is capable of salivating at the sight of food.
- The same dog does not react to a bell.
- When the dog is shown the food and the bell rings, in repeated opportunities, the only sound of the bell will make it salivate, what is a conditioned response.
The bell, a neutral stimulus, and salivation have become a conditioned stimulus and response, respectively.
Regarding other options:
<em> a. A conditioned stimulus does not lead to an unconditioned one.
</em>
<em> b. A neutral stimulus does not result in reinforcement.
</em>
<em> c. Pavlov's experiment did not demonstrate the conversion of a conditioned stimulus into a neutral stimulus.</em>
Answer:
being a good role model is about making good desicions so she stuck with it.
I don't understand the sentences part... DNA is made up of nucleic acids. Bases adenine, guanine, thymine, and cytosine are then added in. They make different combinations, or sequences. Maybe these are the sentences you're talking about?
Answer:
Multiple Systemic insulin dependent insufficiency
Explanation:
the patient being a known diabetic patient has presented with some clinical sign of Type 2 Diabetes and has further lead to complication such as eye problem and renal problems which is expected because there is a decrease glomerular filtration rate and also have to struggle with his sight because of increased glucose in the blood that the available insulin hormone could not identify and break down appropriately.
