Answer: x=4,y=5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The correct option is D.) Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion is not correct because
D.) Causation cannot be determined from an observational study.
Causation determined from an observational study is speculative and cannot be confirmed without data from a real experiment.
The answer is 1400 because he got 400$ on the third to last week, 500$ on the second to last week, and 500$ on the last week. that adds up to 1400$
Answer:
7.2%
Step-by-step explanation:
P = (0.72)⁸
P ≈ 0.072
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
Total units = 250
Current occupants = 223
Rent per unit = 892 slips of Gold-Pressed latinum
Current rent = 892 x 223 =198,916 slips of Gold-Pressed latinum
After increase in the rent, then the rent function becomes
Let us conside 'y' is increased in amount of rent
Then occupants left will be [223 - y]
Rent = [892 + 2y][223 - y] = R[y]
To maximize rent =

Since 'y' comes in negative, the owner must decrease his rent to maximixe profit.
Since there are only 250 units available;
![y=-250+223=-27\\\\maximum \,profit =[892+2(-27)][223+27]\\=838 * 250\\=838\,for\,250\,units](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%3D-250%2B223%3D-27%5C%5C%5C%5Cmaximum%20%5C%2Cprofit%20%3D%5B892%2B2%28-27%29%5D%5B223%2B27%5D%5C%5C%3D838%20%2A%20250%5C%5C%3D838%5C%2Cfor%5C%2C250%5C%2Cunits)
Optimal rent - 838 slips of Gold-Pressed latinum