Answer:
Jaxon Furnishings Company Vs Logging Opportunities in Alaska
Comparison of the benefits of increased wood production to the costs of deforestation:
The company is using the __environmental sustainability___ approach to make this ethical decision.
Explanation:
According to brittanica.com, environmental "sustainability is understood as a form of intergenerational ethics in which the environmental and economic actions taken by present persons do not diminish the opportunities of future persons to enjoy similar levels of wealth, utility, or welfare."
An approach to an ethical decision is sustainable when it considers the long-term benefits and costs associated with the decision, instead of concentrating on the short-term benefits as some business transactions are done. Short-termism selfishly considers the immediate gains from a transaction. It lacks a futuristic appetite for the good of future generations.
Answer:
$31,100
Explanation:
On May 31 of the current year, the assets and liabilities of Riser, Inc. are as follows: Cash $20,500; Accounts Receivable, $7,250; Supplies, $650; Equipment, $12,000; Accounts Payable, $9,300.
Therefore the amount of stockholders’ equity as of May 31 of the current year can be derived by the formula : Capital = Assets - Liabilities
<u>Assets</u>
Cash $20,500;
Accounts Receivable, $7,250;
Supplies, $650;
Equipment, $12,000
TOTAL = 40,400
<u>Liabilities</u>
Accounts Payable, $9,300.
Therefore stockholders’ equity = 40,400 - 9,300 = $31,100
Answer:
$112,500
Explanation:
The good will to be reported in the balance sheet of the Pacific Corporation as at December 31 shall be determined using the following mentioned method:
Cost to acquire share of the Pacific Corporation $2,850,000
Less:Net Assets Acquired of Sand Corporation
Sand Net Assets $3,000,000
Excess value of land $200,000
Excess value of equipment $150,000
Fair value of non-compete $300,000
$3,650,000 ($3,650,000)
Add:Net Assets portion of the Non controlling interest $912,500
($3,650,000*25%)
Good will $112,500
Direct labour rate variance = (3875) unfavourable, Direct labour efficiency rate = (800) unfavourable
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>Computation of Direct Material Price & Quantity Variance
</u>
Direct Material Purchase - Price variance = (SP minus AP) multiply AQ Purchase ($1.45 minus $1.48) multiply19000 = ($570) Unfavourable
Direc Material Quantity Variance =(SQ-AQ)SP =
((20 multiply600)-10500) multiply$1.45 = $2,175 Favourable
Direct Material Price variance - (SP minus AP)AQ Used = ($1.45minus $1.48) multiply10500 = ($315) Unfavourable
<u>Computation of Direct Labour Rate & Efficiency Variance
</u>
Direct Labour Rate variance = (SR minus AR)multiply AH
= ($8 minus $9.25) multiply3100 = -3875 Un Favourable
Direct Labour Efficiency Variance (SH minus AH)multiply SR
= ((5 multiply 600) minus 3100)multiply8) = -800 Un Favourable
Answer:
a. 125.43 hours
b. 767.92 hours
c. 2,129.04 hours
Explanation:
Using the mathematical approach, we have :
y = ax ^b
Where ,
y is the average time to manufacture x units
a is the time its takes to manufacture first plane
b is the log of 80% divided by log 2
Then,
Average time for 5 planes = 300 (5)^-0.322
= 178.67 hours
Total time for 5 planes = 178.67 hours × 5
= 893.35
Average time for 4 planes = 300 (4)^-0.322
= 191.98 hours
Total time for 5 planes = 191.98 hours × 4
= 767.92 hours
The fifth plane would take = 893.35 - 767.92
= 125.43 hours
Average time for the 18 planes = 300(18)^-0.322
= 118,28 hours
Total time for 18 planes = 118,28 hours × 18
= 2,129.04 hours
