Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.
<span>A firm determines its profit by subtracting total cost from revenue</span>
Here are the tools and services that might be beneficial for Lily:
- Brokerage service, so Lilly could gain access to various kind of private company that is not available on the stock market.
- Stock market software, which contains algorithms that analyze the stock price movement and create a graph to predict how the future price might go.
Answer:
$526 was the spending variance in November
Explanation:
The spending variance in the month involves knowing the difference between actual supplies cost incurred in the month and the budgeted supplies cost based on actual activity
Budgeted supplies cost based on actual activity of 608 frames=$1080+(608*$18)
Budgeted supplies cost based on actual activity of 608 frames=$1080+$10,944=$12,024
Spending variance=$12,550-$12.024
=$526
The actual spend was $526 more than the budgeted spend based on actual activity,hence an unfavorable variance was recorded
Answer:
$154,900
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost of operating the assembly department as follows:
= Direct expenses of assembly department + allocated amount
= $123,400 + $52,500 × 69,000 ÷ (69,000 + 46,000)
= $123,400 + $52,500 × 69,000 ÷ 115,000
= $123,400 + $31,500
= $154,900
