Answer:
Jaxon Furnishings Company Vs Logging Opportunities in Alaska
Comparison of the benefits of increased wood production to the costs of deforestation:
The company is using the __environmental sustainability___ approach to make this ethical decision.
Explanation:
According to brittanica.com, environmental "sustainability is understood as a form of intergenerational ethics in which the environmental and economic actions taken by present persons do not diminish the opportunities of future persons to enjoy similar levels of wealth, utility, or welfare."
An approach to an ethical decision is sustainable when it considers the long-term benefits and costs associated with the decision, instead of concentrating on the short-term benefits as some business transactions are done. Short-termism selfishly considers the immediate gains from a transaction. It lacks a futuristic appetite for the good of future generations.
Answer:
Assuming Simon’s AGI is $40,000.
Gambling losses are only deductible to the extent of gambling winnings. Thus,Simon cannot deduct any of the $4,300 gambling losses. The $3,160 transportation expenses are also nondeductible as they are deemed to be personal expenses. The $2,650 broker management fees are deductible as investment fees (miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% AGI floor), and the $1,030 tax return fees are also deductible as miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% AGI floor.
Thus, $2,650 + $1,030 – (2% x $40,000 AGI) = $2,880 deduction
Domestic gross product (GDP) is used for overall monitoring of an economy. In this regard, it measures the well-being of the society.
In the current scenario, the funds invested was $3 million while the overall value of the harvest was $8 million. In this regard, the overall contribution to the GDP in 2014 due to the transactions described is the overall harvest and that is $8 million worthy of cereal.
This is a key idea with international trade. This involves what is known as comparative advantage.
let's say country A can produce a ton of soybeans in 4 hours and a ton of corn in 2 hours. While country B can produce a ton of soybeans in 15 hours and a ton of corn in 5 hours.
Looking at this set up you can see that country A can produce both corn and soybeans faster, so they have an absolute advantage in both!
However what trade is based on is opportunity cost. So if we think about how much corn country A has to give up to produce soybeans, they have to divert a total of 4 hours from corn to soy beans to produce one ton of soy beans. That 4 hours could be used to produce 2 tons of corn (since 2 hours for 1 ton and we're taking away 4 hours!). So opportunity cost of soybeans in country A is 2 corn.
In country B they would need a total of 15 hours to produce one extra ton of soybeans, but those 15 hours could instead be used to produce 3 tons of corn (5 hours per ton and we're stealing 15 total hours). That means country B's opportunity cost is 3 corn.
Since A has a lower opportunity cost in produce soybeans they will specialize and B will specialize in corn.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
moneys always good motivation
