For the answer to the questions above, I believe that <em><u>it is because the constitution is a living document and it should not be stagnant and resistant to change, and is therefore allowed to change to meet the USA's needs at the time.</u></em>
What is working before maybe won't work in the future.
Around 1900, European nations built up their military forces, formed alliances, and expanded their colonial holdings in their efforts to force their enemies to start wars, keep control of a balanced power, place a conscription system in place, and end the spirit of militarism.
It would lead an anarchy (a government without order) because there would be no president to or constitution to set laws in place.
1. south Africa kingdoms
2. Arab's
hope this helps because the second one is 100% correct because Americans never excisted in history in that time period.... the first one im in 50% sure its the answer
Nothing, the Olympic games continued manifesting. In the first case there was a reaction but it was decided to keep them going and that it would be a response to show that they are not afraid. The Atlanta disturbance was about there being a stolen gold medal, not that much about terrorism.
<span />
