<u>The contract between Pierre and Shayna is not a valid contract due to the lack of acceptance from Shayna.
</u>
Further Explanation:
Contract:
A legally enforced agreement is considered a contract. An agreement is a promise between two parties to perform tasks for each other for some consideration. When an agreement becomes legally enforced, then it is considered as a contract. So the contract is a legally enforced promise between two parties for considerations. Both parties should get consideration and have a performance obligation.
Following factors are required for the contract:
Offer: A person should offer some consideration to another person for performing any activity or in the exchange of goods.
Acceptance of offer: The other person should accept the offer made by the first person.
Valuable consideration: There should be valuable consideration for both the parties.
Mutual obligation: Parties should promise to execute their obligated activities.
The performance capacity of the parties: Parties should be capable of performing the contract.
Legally enforcement: The contracts should be legally enforced.
These are the basic elements of a contract. If any contracts lack any of the given factors, then it will not be considered as a valid contract.
The contract between Pierre and Shayna:
In the current case, Pierre makes an offer to sell the painting to Shayna. Pierre leaves a message in the voicemail of Shayna, stating that if Shayna does not contact Pierre within one hour, then Pierre would consider that the Shayna wants to purchase the painting.
It is not a valid contract as it lacks the acceptance of the offer from Shayna.
Pierre enters the contract to sell the painting without considering the acceptance of the offer by Shayna. Pierre puts a condition that if she does not receive any revert from Shayna within one hour, then she would consider that Shayna has accepted the offer. For a valid contract, the promisee should accept the offer but the condition of acceptance (revert within one hour) does not state for the acceptance of Shayna. So, it will not be considered a valid contract.
<u>Thus, the contract between Pierre and Shayna is not a valid contract due to non-acceptence.
</u>
Learn more:
1. Learn more about the cash deficiency
brainly.com/question/12981857
2. Learn more about the span of control
brainly.com/question/12986822
3. Learn more about the sales budget
brainly.com/question/12985585
Answer details:
Grade: Senior School
Subject: Business Law
Chapter: Contract Act
Keywords: Pierre, message, Shayna, voicemail, painting, mind, sell, steal, people, ASAP, hear, within an hour, not a valid contract, purchase a painting, lack of a(n), contract act, agreement, law, business law, promise, valid contract.
![\begin{tabular} {|p {3.5cm}|p {2.0cm}|p {2.6cm}|} \multicolumn {3} {|c|} {Elvis' Fried Peanut Butter and Banana Sandwich Benefit}\\[2ex] Fried PBB Sandwiches&Total Benefit (dollars)&Marginal Benefit (dollars)\\[1ex] 1&&42\\ 2&&24\\ 3&75&\\ 4&81&\\ 5&&-3 \end{tabular}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%0A%7B%7Cp%20%7B3.5cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B2.0cm%7D%7Cp%20%7B2.6cm%7D%7C%7D%0A%5Cmulticolumn%20%7B3%7D%20%7B%7Cc%7C%7D%20%7BElvis%27%20Fried%20Peanut%20Butter%20and%20Banana%20Sandwich%20Benefit%7D%5C%5C%5B2ex%5D%0AFried%20PBB%20Sandwiches%26Total%20Benefit%20%28dollars%29%26Marginal%20Benefit%20%28dollars%29%5C%5C%5B1ex%5D%0A1%26%2642%5C%5C%0A2%26%2624%5C%5C%0A3%2675%26%5C%5C%20%09%0A4%2681%26%5C%5C%20%09%0A5%26%26-3%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D)