Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
FIFO inventory cost method will yield the highest taxable income during times of inflation or period of rising price.
FIFO is First in First out i.e the inventory that was purchase first will go out first. This method reflects the current market price because last inventories bought during inflation are part of the ending inventories. Ending inventories are high, cost of sales are low and gross profit is high.
Because gross profit is high, high tax will be charged
Answer:
c.Create, Vinyl, Digital, and Record
Explanation:
The answer is
c.Create, Vinyl, Digital, and Record
Since Create Inc. which is a domestic corporation, owns 100% shares in two enterprises. One is Vinyl Ltd. which is a foreign corporation and the other is Digital Inc. which is a domestic corporation. And Create Inc. also happens to own 12% shares in a domestic corporation named Record Inc.
Now since Create Inc. owns shares in all the three corporations, all these corporations's net income will be included in the Create's income statement current-year financial report.
Thus the answer is
c.Create, Vinyl, Digital, and Record
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
When Home Depot stores entered the Canadian market, there were already stores providing similar services and products. It employed Competitive effect To get people to try Home Depot by deliberately selling merchandise below the price that the Canadians did.
Explanation:
The competitive effect is the concept that allows a certain individual or organization to become attractive to customers under a scenario of pre-established markets by reducing its cost or prices making the organization competent in the market by driving the rest of the organizations in the industry compete with their costs or prices.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Sold product liability suit against the maker, alleging a design defect, the court may consider an available alternative design
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
At the core of the idea of faulty item configuration exemplified in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Product Liability is the accessibility of a sensible elective plan that could have diminished or kept away from the danger of mischief. In any case, a product might be defective, regardless of whether no sensible elective plan exists, if it neglects to give possible directions or warnings of a predictable danger of damage. An ongoing choice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court represents the use of these standards.