<span>The best advice to be given to Ms. Lee in regards to the
scenario is that she has the eligibility for a SEP in which she could enrolled
in before she could even move to the location where she would likely be
residing to. With this plan, if she notified about moving earlier or in
advance, the period will only last for about two months in addition.</span>
Answer:
$42,000
Explanation:
Data provided
Bonds at a discount = $49,000
Sold bonds at a premium = $12,000
Discount amount = $19,000
The computation of the sale of bonds is shown below:-
Cost + Premium - (Cost - Carrying value cost)
Carrying cost = $49,000 - $19,000
= $30,000
Sale of bonds = (Bonds at a discount + Sold bonds at a premium) - (Bonds at a discount - Carrying cost)
($49,000 + $12,000) - ($49,000 - $30,000)
= $42,000
Answer:
From the given Matrix we can see that if videotech is selecting a high price, movietonia has a higher profit when it is charging a low price and this profit is 18. Similarly when videotech is selecting a lower price movietonia again has a higher profit when it is selecting a lower price which is 10. This indicates that movie tonia has a dominant strategy of selecting a low price.
If movietonia is selecting a high price videotech has a a higher pay off of 18 when it is selecting a low price. In case movietonia is selecting a low price videotech again has a higher profit when it is selecting a low price and this profi is 10.
Therefore videotech and movietonia both have dominant strategy of selecting a low price and this implies that low price, low price will be the Nash equilibrium.
In case the two firms are not colluding, both of them will choose a low price.
This is definitely an example of business dilemma game. The statement is true.
Explanation:
<span>During the recession witnessed in early 2001, many firms laid off their employees and downsized. The reason for the downsizing of employees from these firms in 2001 was the incompetency and poor performance of the employees. It may sound mean but to the company, this is advantageous since they can reduce the costing while at the same time maintain or increase the final goods.</span>
Answer:
$800 million
Explanation:
GDP = consumption (C) + investment (I) + government spending (G) + Net Export (NX)
Y = C + I + G + NX
The number of computers left is
= 1,000,000 - 200,000 (household) - 300,000 (businesses) - 300,000 (government) - 100,000 (Foreign)
= 100,000
This worth 100,000 × $2,000 = 200 million
300,000 computers × $2,000 = 600 million
Total of these two = 200 + 600 million
= 800 million
Therefore, the value of the investment component of GDP is $800 million.