Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

6

When you have carefully checked all the facts and your attitudes and still find that there’s just something about your superviso

r that’s causing a problem in your relationship, you should suspect that

1 answer:

Anna11 [10]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Your answer to that is try to talk it out with someone and dont hold it in.

Explanation:Have fun and a great day

You might be interested in

True or False: A small number of institutional investors are often able and motivated to bring direct shareholder pressure on a

Pani-rosa [81]

Answer: True

Explanation:

The agency problem is when there is a conflict of interest between the management of a company and the stockholders that exists in the company.

In order to help reduce the potential agency conflicts that at occur during the course of a business, a few of the institutional investors often bring in the pressure of the direct shareholder on the management of a firm. They believe by involving the shareholders, the management will try not to have any differences with the shareholders and thereby reducing agency problem.

3 0

2 years ago

Camden Corporations agreed to build a warehouse for a client at an agreed contract price of $ 900,000. Expected (and actual) cos

weqwewe [10]

Answer:

Key figures:

2016:

Revenue = $270,000

Expenses = $202,500

Income = $67,500

2017:

Revenue = $450,000

Expenses = $337,500

Income = $112,500

2018:

Revenue = $180,000

Expenses = $135,000

Income = $45,000

Explanation:

Under this method, percentage of work completed is determined using the following <u>formula:</u>

<em>Percentage of work completed = (Total Expenses incurred on the project till the close of the accounting period) ÷ (Total Estimated Cost of the Contract)</em>

Total estimated cost = $202,500 + $337,500 + $135,000 = $675,000

<u>2016:</u>

Percentage of work completed = ($202,500 ÷ $675,000)×100 = 30%

Expenses in 2016 = $202,500 (answer)

Revenue in 2016 = $900,000 × 30% = $270,000 (answer)

Income in 2016 = Revenue - Expenses

Income in 2016 = $270,000 - $202,500

Income in 2016 = $67,500 (answer)

<u>2017:</u>

Percentage of work completed = ($337,500 ÷ $675,000)×100 = 50%

Expenses in 2017 = $337,500 (answer)

Revenue in 2017 = $900,000 × 50% = $450,000 (answer)

Income in 2017 = Revenue - Expenses

Income in 2017 = $450,000 - $337,500

Income in 2017 = $112,500 (answer)

<u>2018:</u>

Percentage of work completed = ($135,000 ÷ $675,000)×100 = 20%

Expenses in 2018 = $135,000 (answer)

Revenue in 2018 = $900,000 × 20% = $180,000 (answer)

Income in 2018 = Revenue - Expenses

Income in 2018 = $180,000 - $135,000

Income in 2018 = $45,000 (answer)

4 0

2 years ago

Davidson offers several solutions to the major issues, stating that fiscally we are actually not a nation that is divided on the

Mila [183]

QUESTION 1.
Some of the fiscal solutions that Davidson mentions tweaking in a bid to cut government spending multiple subtle ways <span>are as follows:
I. R</span>aise social security retirement age
II. Reduce medicare for wealthy seniors
III. Raise medical <span>healthcare contributions

</span>QUESTION 2.
According to Davidson, the republican and the democrat philosophies are two fundamentally different economic philosophies that impact the debt crisis faced by the United States. In his opinion, the republicans want a system in which the government’s only job should be to create an efficient society, whereas the Democrats aim at making sure that everyone lives in an “equitable, fair society”. I think I would agree more with the Democrat philosophy because equity and fairness to everyone is<span> a key public value outcome in every society.

</span>
QUESTION 3.
<span>The two fiscal issues that are hyper-partisan are as follows:
I. </span>Military defense spending.
II. I<span>ssues of taxes
</span>- The parties are so divided chiefly because they have extreme opposites points of view on several issues.
- On the issues, I lean towards the Democrat view.

QUESTION 4.
Towards the end of his talk, Davidson says he fears that the longer we delay any solution, the more the world will look to the U.S. not as the bedrock of stability in the global economy, but as a place that can't resolve its own fights. He explains that the higher interest rates are going to be, the quicker we're going to have to face a day of horrible calamity.

4 0

2 years ago

The following information is taken from the income statement of Olympic, Inc.: Depreciation Expense $ 90,000 Amortization Expens

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

The correct option is D,$402,000.

Explanation:

In determining the cash flow provided by operating activities,we need to adjust the net income for effects of non cash items reported.It is important to note that the reverse of the earlier treatment of the items is what is required now.For instance depreciation and amortization were deducted in income statement,for cash flow purposes we need to add both to net income.

Net income $315,000

add depreciation $90,000

amortization $15,000

loss on sale of equipment $9,000

less gain on sale of building($27000)

Cash flow from operations $402,000

The cash flow from operating activities as adjusted is $402,000.

6 0

1 year ago

The Super Discount store (open 24 hours a day, every day) sells 8-packs of paper towels, at the rate of approximately 420 packs

BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

a) 2,093

b) It will reorder once there are 420 units left (demand during lead-time)

c) 34 days

Explanation:

a) economic order quantity

$Q_{opt} = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}}$

<u>Where:</u>

D = annual demand = 21,900

S= setup cost = ordering cost = 50

H= Holding Cost = 0.50

$Q_{opt} = \sqrt{\frac{2(21,900)(50)}{0.50}}$

EOQ = 2092.844954

b) it takes four days to arrive:

if it sale 420 units per week then:

420 x 4/7 = 240 units are demand during delivery

c) order cycle:

EOQ / Annual Demand

2,093 / 21,900 = 0,09557 x 365 = 34.8333 days

It will order every 34 days (if it orders after 35 days will face shortage)

3 0

2 years ago