Answer:
$78.06
Explanation:
For computing the monthly payment we need to apply the PMT formula i.e. to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,650
Future value or Face value = $0
RATE = 12.5% ÷ 12 = 1.0416%
NPER = 24 months
The formula is shown below:
= PMT(RATE;NPER;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the monthly payment is $78.06
Answer:
The cost per month is increasing at a rate $365.
Explanation:
Differentiation Formula
Given that,
A manufacturer of handcrafted wine racks has determined that the cost to produce x units per month is given by
.
Again given that,
the rate of changing production is 13 unit per month
i.e 
To find the cost per month, we need to find out the value
when production is changing at the rate 13 units per month and the production is 70 units.

Differentiating with respect to t




Plugging 


[ plugging x=70]
=364
[ The unit of c is not given. Assume that the unit of c is dollar.]
The cost per month is increasing at a rate $365.
Answer:
Option e. is correct
Explanation:
The Terms of Trade is equal to the average price of exports / by the average price of imports. The terms-of-trade refers to the relative price of exports in terms of imports.
Protective effect refers to the wasted resources due to production of good at a higher cost. Consumption effect refers to the loss to consumer due to higher price that leads to less consumption.
Should the home country be "large" relative to the world, its imposition of a tariff on imports would lead to an increase in domestic welfare if the terms-of-trade effect exceeds the sum of the <u>protective effect plus consumption effect</u>
Answer:
The BCWS is also known as Planned Value (PV).
So, in this way, <em>PV = 3.125.000</em>
Explanation:
With the data we can obtain the PV as follows:
First, let's calculate EV as EV = CV + AC.
EV = -500.000 + 4.000.000 = <em>3.500.000</em>
After this, we can calculate PV with this formula: SPI = EV/PV
PV = EV/SPI
PV = 3.500.000/1.12 = <em>3.125.000</em>
<em />
<em>We can conclude, with these results, that the project actually is forward about the schedule but with an overcost about the budget. In other words, the project advance must be 41% but now is on 36% due to the negative variance on the costs (CV).</em>
<em />
Answer:
c. criterion deficiency
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario it seems that the performance management system suffers from Criterion deficiency. This term refers to a company failing to assess one or more very important aspects of the process of job performance appraisal for employees within the company. Such as is the case in this scenario as the company is only looking at the sales revenue and completely ignoring all of the other important factors.