Answer:
Q 2. First, it would be necessary to listen to the boy's parents and listen to the boy's explanations of why he is acting this way. Once I knew both sides of the story, I could better assess the situation and establish a dialogue between parents and children so that both could speak their complaints and talk about how they can change this situation.
Q 3. My daily private victory is carried out with the following activities: 1. Organizing my day's tasks so that I know exactly what I should do, 2. Do not put off my obligations and do them at the right times, 3. Remember to put moments of rest in order not to be overwhelmed, 4. Only start an activity when I finish the one that has already started, 5. Do not compare the quality of my activities with the quality of other people's activities, 6. Be kind to my limitations. The time that these activities take to complete is very relative and I don't care about it, but I do care about performing my duties efficiently so that I can feel the sense of victory. The activities that are excluded from the daily private victory are those that prohibit an individual from being proactive, cause the individual to start acting without having a goal as the desired end and activities that disorganize and do not establish what must be done first.
Explanation:
In the case shown in Q 2. it shows a situation that must be evaluated carefully and must take into account how the parents and the boy feel and what makes them act the way they do. Only communication between them can resolve this situation. It is important for the boy to explain why he is acting this way, how important it is for his parents to listen to him without judgment and for everyone to accept and try to change his mistakes.
Q 3. talks about “Daily Private Victory”, which are victories that bring personal satisfaction to an individual. This satisfaction need not be resilient to great things, but small situations that happen in the individual's life and allow him to be satisfied with himself and the environment around him.
a contingency break; inattentional blindness
This scene is an example of a contingency break. A contingency break is when, in a piece of media (usually children movies or TV shows) a scene occurs that is immediately retconned in the next scene. A common example of this is in children's cartoons, when a character may have gotten their clothes dirty in one scene, but they are back to normal in the next with no time for them to have been cleaned. This applies to the movie <em>Shrek</em>, as the three blind mice are turned into horses in one frame, but are back to the status quo in the next.
Inattentional blindness is the failure to notice a fully visible, but unexpected, object/action because one's attention was on another object/action. A contingency break can be considered a "real-life" example of inattentional blindness because, if this scene occurred in real-life, you would not notice the mice turning back to normal as your attention was not focused on them.
Answer:
By combining sentences 4 and 5 with the transition word "so"
Explanation:
The best way to revise the paragraph to connect ideas is by combining sentences 4 and 5 with the transition word "so"
Answer:
The correct answers are B and E.
Explanation:
The two themes developed in "The Glittering Noise" are that the past can be an escape from the present, since the author says that she could be happy by reading old diaries, that is, remembering old times; and that in every era, people experience sorrow and joy, as she experiences both feelings when remembering events from the past.
