Lori has already decided she wants to sell beauty products and market them to small beauty salons. She now needs to decide how she wants to price her product so that the beauty salons will buy it. Option B. decide how to price her product is the next step that Lori should take. After she decided the price, she will have the what, where and how much and then she can move on to how she will advertise her product to the small beauty stores.
<span>Let us assume Toni made 100 apple pies in 10 hours, that means 10/hour.
Now, with help of assistant she produces 60% more and work for 20% less time.
So,
[100+(60% of 100)] = 160 apple pies produced in [10-(20% of 10)]= 8 hours.
160/8 = 20/hour
So, with the help of assistant Toni's output of apple pies per hour increases by 100%.</span>
Answer: c. Demand decreases and supply decreases.
Explanation:
When demand for tablets decrease, the demand curve shifts to the right. The price and quantity declines. At the same time, when supply also falls, the supply curve shifts to the left leading to an increase in price and a fall in quantity.
Since, decrease in demand and supply have opposite effect on the price there is no change in the price of tablets.
Both the forces work towards reducing quantity to quantity will fall unambiguously.
Thus, the correct option is c, Demand decreases and supply decreases.
Answer:
Pros: Use of singe hurdle rate saves time in the evaluation of projects which results in prompt decision making.
Cons: Company may reject good projects and accept bad ones due to the assumptions underlying WACC use in capital budgeting.
Explanation:
Pros of using WACC: The use of WACC implies that the company uses a single hurdle rate for all projects, which simplifies the decision making and saves time when evaluating projects
Cons of using WACC: Use of WACC assumes that there is no change in capital structure i.e all projects are financed in exactly the same way and all projects have the same risk . These assumptions may lead to the company rejecting good projects and accepting bad ones. For example the company may accept a high risk project with a return of 14% when the minimum return that should be accepted according to the high risk divisional WACC is 16%. Likewise, the company may reject a low risk project with a return of 11%, when it is in fact a good project whose minimum return should be 8% as per the low risk divisional WACC.
Answer:
ans-b
Explanation:
The ans is b, hope it helped you.Have a nive day