Answer:
C The author draws a comparison between the chemical transformation of Jekyll into Hyde and the real-life shift from ordinary person to evil-doer.
Explanation:
<u>The author tried to show the shift of people's morals into evil with the idea of how Jekyll and his chemical transformation into the evil Mr. Hyde.</u>
<u>Dr. Jekyll was trying to prove the duality of the people and their evil and good sides, but his experiment turned bad for him. In the end, he could not control his evil side anymore. </u>
<u>The author is trying with this to show how with doing more and more evil deeds normal person can shift into the evil-doer, and that there is no turning back. </u>
<u>There is no border anymore between good and the bad side</u>, a person can't just transform back, just as Jekyll couldn't control himself with chemicals anymore at the end.
The correct answer is Jerry.
Since Kevin and Mark eat carpool with the manager, that means that neither of them is the manager.
That leaves two options: Jerry and Tom. But later on, we are told that Tom watches TV with the manager.
Therefore, the only possible answer is Jerry.
Answer:
In the story, "The Valiant Woman" by J.J. Powers, we find that in judging people, we overlook most of the characteristics that draw us to them, but we do so without realizing it. We can draw inaccurate conclusions about a person by misjudging their facial expressions, their physical stamina, and their obvious personality traits. When people are blinded by false superiority, they judge a person incorrectly because they fail to see them as they really are.
Explanation:
The paragraph has been revised and the inconsistencies with the shift of person and shift of number have been corrected.
It has been rewritten and consistency was maintained by making use of the first person plural when referring to readers, and the third person plural nouns and pronouns when referring to those being judged.
Answer:
An <u>Action Potential</u> is an <u><em>"All or Nothing"</em></u> phenomenon. It was first described in 1871 by a Physiologist Henry Pickering Bowditch.
Explanation:
The action potential is always a full response, there is no such thing as a strong or weak potential. This means that when<u> a stimulus is given, a neuron either does not reach the threshold or a full action potential is fired</u>.
<u><em>STATEMENT OF LAW:</em></u>
The all or none law states that , <u>the strength of a response of a nerve cell or a muscle fiber do not depends upon the strength of a stimulus. If a stimulus is above a certain threshold, the nerve cell will send the information down the axon towards the synapse and the signal is being propagated.</u>
<u><em>SIGNIFICANCE:</em></u>
The significance of this law is that<u> it minimizes the possibility of information to be lost along the way.</u>
This law was initially applied to the muscles of heart but later it was found to be true for neuronal cells and other muscle fibers too.
Thus an action potential is all or nothing event.
Foreshadowing is when the author gives hints to the reader about events that will happen later in the book. So, in "Animal Farm," you can discuss the fact that shortly after the supposedly egalitarian farm is created, the cows' extra milk mysteriously vanishes, and it is implied that Napoleon (whose name even foreshadows dictatorship) is the one who drank it (end of Chapter 2).
