<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
Answer:
See below:
Explanation:
A - Lawrence Kohlberg interviewed a group of young men about moral decision making.
D - Preconventional reasoning is based on following one’s moral principles, but Postconventional reasoning is based on doing what is best for oneself.
D - “Once a person begins to think in a Stage 5 way about what benefits the community as a whole, they will almost never go back to a Stage 2 level of looking out for themselves first.” ( Paragraph 16)
B - Kohlberg could understand how people decided what was the right thing to do.
Write a summary of the article “How do we tell right from wrong?”
--> Sorry friend, you're going to have to write the summary yourself.
I hope this helps! I was not fully sure if the answer was C or D for the third question, but I put D because preconventional reasoning is external (if that makes sense). Have a good night!
- sincerelynini
I think it’s C, he felt a sense of threat and loss that many Africans faced when the empire invaded and disrupted their lives.
Answer: The sentence should be revised in order to make it more formal.
The sentence is written in a way that copies colloquial speech. However, it is not appropriate for a written analysis.
For example, the word "totally," although appropriate in some circumstances, is ambiguous and overly familiar in this case. Moreover, contractions should not be used in formal writing. Finally, some of the words used in the sentence are not very clear, such as "things." A revised sentence would look something like this:
<em>"Nazario feels that refugee children should not be sent back to the same dangerous circumstances they have left</em>."
If he didn't use chronological order, the events of the passage would not be in order. Chronological order is arranging things in the order it happened. Its effects on the arrangement of the plot are he is not actually doing, he is thinking all of this
