Answer:1. The higher before tax real gain is for Steve for $2000 i.e (32,000- 30,000) while Stephanie makes $1800(6% of $30,000)
2. The higher after tax real gain is for Stephanie losing 35% of her income
which reduce her income to $1170 while Steve loss 50% of his income which reduce to $1000.
Explanation
The inflation rate is not considered in the calculation because it's constant for both parties.
Answer:
B) complements
Explanation:
The cross elasticity shows a relationship between the percentage change in quantity demanded with the percentage change in the price.
In case of the substitute goods, the relation between the price and the quantity demanded is positive that means if the price of goods increased than the quantity demanded is also increased
And, In case of the complementary goods, the relation between the price and the quantity demanded is negative that means if the price of goods increased than the quantity demanded is decreased
According to the given situation, the most appropriate option is B.
Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
Answer:
A. ($16,000)
Explanation:
The computation of the expected value of return equal to
= (Higher return × probability rate) - (Less return - probability rate)
= ($20,000 × 70%) - ($100,000 × 30%)
= $14,000 - $30,000
= - $16,000
For computing the correct value we have to deduct the tighter money conditions from the normal conditions.
Answer:
D) According to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Edie can be required to retire at a certain age, because she is in an occupation where evidence exists that ability to perform the job diminishes significantly with age.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that edie wants to fight the rulling that depend upon the age discrimination so here we considered the option d as in that it is given that edie needs to retire at the specific age as she belongs from occupation in which the evidence is existed that shows the capability to perform the job which reduced within the age
