Vintage cigarette advertising companies used to reach customers by- b. affecting people emotionally through holiday connections and e. making tobacco seem wholesome and good.
The 20th century vintage cigarette advertisements presented the injurious act of cigarette smoking very glamorous and sometimes they insisted on using them for healthy habits. It was ridiculous for them to promote the then cigarette brands by manipulating their potential customers, mainly the women.
Brands like- “Lucky- strike” and “Craven ‘A’” targeted their customers by affecting them emotionally by establishing holiday connections to tobacco smoking; they described their potential women customers as “charming”. They also claimed that it actually reliefs a sore throat.
They made their ads more appealing until American President Richard Nixon banned the broadcasting of cigarette ads by signing the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act on 1970, 1st April.
"Alertness and focus" are a variety of answers i would use.
Intuition might tell us that rough surfaces on clothing would inhibit the speed of an Olympic athlete. It is not true in some cases because rough clothing could not inhibit the performance of an athlete. If the athlete however had the experience first hand while during practice, in wearing such rough outfits then it would not inhibit his performance during his competition. But, if during the competition, he suddenly had to wear a smooth clothing, then he would have a hard time dealing with it during his competition because it is not the one that he had his practice on. So in short, it all boils down on how people adapt to these things and how well they can execute certain things that are not common to everybody. Maybe for some, if they had the time to practice using smooth clothing then it would not be a problem with promoting with their speed.
False. everyone is different. some may be asymptomatic (showing no symptoms) then you have people who do show nausea, vomiting, tiredness, and soreness.
