Answer:
She felt proud and also felt closer to her own heritage and home.
Explanation:
<em>Montreal 1962</em> is a short story by Shauna Singh Baldwin, recollecting her first experience of being a Sardar's wife in a foreign land. She recounts how her husband was asked to remove his hair and turban to be employed.
The short story delves into how she, as a Sardar's wife, felt about her husband's predicament on being asked to be 'normal' like the Canadians and get rid of his natural identity- the turban and his hair and be clean-shaven. While her husband was out working, she took upon herself to wash and then work on even trying to tie a turban, like her husband and others must have done before her. And in the process, she began to understand the significance and even the cultural significance of the turban. She felt that it is what makes them “them”, declaring that she will not let their tradition and culture be taken away from them.
She came to the realization of the turban's significance in their lives and decides to stand by him no matter what happens. She will work for her hands and help him to tie his turban, and then she <em>"will have taught Canadians what it takes to wear a turban".
</em>
<em></em>
I think it would be A and B because that's all I remember people doing for him in the book
Answer:
A
Explanation:
If your question is...
Which statement matches the author’s viewpoint about Malala in this passage?
The author sympathizes with Malala’s fear that school might not reopen.
The author thinks Malala is foolish for thinking school might not reopen.
The author thinks Malala should not be playing while so much is at stake.
The author thinks Malala is acting too hopeful about school reopening.
your answer is A ( The author sympathizes with Malala’s fear that school might not reopen. )
HOPE IT HELPS!! AND STAY SAFE DURING THIS TIME :D
The third sentence. <span>The football team repeats their motivational chant before every game: “We’re going to win, win, win!”</span>.
Answer:
Run-on sentences make text more difficult to read.
Run-on sentences can change the intended meaning of a text.
Run-on sentences can make a sentence confusing.
Explanation:
A run-on sentence occurs when two or more independent clauses (complete sentences) are not connected properly. An example of a run-on sentence is a comma splice, which occurs when independent clauses are connected with just a comma.
Example: <em>It is nearly half past five, we cannot reach town before dark. </em>
To correct a comma splice, you can add a conjunction between the clauses, use a semicolon instead of a comma, or make each independent clause its own sentence.
Run-on sentences make the text difficult to read and cause confusion. They can even change the intended meaning of the text. For example, sentences <em>I saw a teacher who cares.</em> and <em>I saw a teacher. Who cares? </em>have completely different meanings.
