Answer:
a)
b) number of flowers.
c) 2830
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
The number of flowers bloomed is given by the function:
where s is the s is the number of seeds she planted.
The number of seeds planted per week is given by
where w represents the number of weeks.
a) composite function that represents how many flowers Lily can expect to bloom over a certain number of weeks.
The composite function can be written as:
where f(w) gives the number of flowers that bloomed in w weeks.
b) units of measurement for the composite function
The composite functions gives the number of flower that will bloom in w weeks. Thus, the unit of measurement is number of flowers.
c) Number of flowers in 35 weeks.
We put w = 35 in the composite function.
2830 flowers will bloom in 35 weeks.
Thanks
Step-by-step explanation:
Try this option (see the attachment). Make design according own requirements.
Note, that the description and details are under green line.
Answer: 0.030921
Solution:
Array means arrangement of numbers in terms of rows and columns.
The conjecture is not True.
So, the conjecture made by chloe that given any two numbers, the greater number can always be arranged into more arrays is not true.
For example ,
1.(2,3)
2→(2×1),(1×2)
3→(3×1),(1×3)
This pair has same number of arrays because both of them are prime.
2. (3,4)
Here, 4>3
3→ (3 × 1),(1×3)
4→(4×1),(1×4),(2×2)
The pair of numbers are Co-prime, one of them is not prime. So Composite number has more number of arrays.
4. (6,11)
6→(1×6),(6×1),(2×3),(3×2)
11→(1×11),(11×1)
The number 6 is smaller, but it has more number of arrays.
5. (6,8)
6→(1×6),(6×1),(2×3),(3×2)
9→(1×9),(9×1),(3×3)
Both the numbers are composite.Smaller number 6 has more arrays.
These examples disprove the Conjecture made by Chloe, which states that given any two numbers, the greater number can always be arranged into more arrays.
No, a proportion will have a constant for the ratio m/d
If m = 0.75d, then ratio m/d = (0.75d)/d = 0.75
In this example, the ratio is (.75d-2)/d = 0.75 - (2/d).
Therefore, it is not proportional.
Pizza flat price is 12.99
each topping is 0.75
cost=pizza+toppings
toppings=number of topings (n) times cost per toping (0.75)
toppings=0.75n
so
cost=12.99+0.75n or
cost=0.75n+12.99
