1- <span>The ancient Chinese board game “Go” is invented long before there was any writing to record its rules. A game from the impossibly distant past has now brought us closer to a moment that once seemed part of an impossibly distant future: a time when machines are cleverer than we are.
<u>Because it's an action that started and finished in the past, this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past)</u>
2- </span><span>For years, Go was considered the last redoubt against the march of computers. Machines might win at chess, draughts, Othello, three-dimensional noughts and crosses, Monopoly, bridge, and poker. Go, though, is different.
<u>This continues the same line of mistake as the first paragraph. Because it's referencing something that already happened ("Go was considered...), this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past).</u>
The game required intuition, strategising <u>and</u> character reading, along with vast numbers of moves and permutations. According to legend, it was invented by a Chinese emperor to teach his subjects balance and patience: qualities unique to human intelligence.
<u>The conjunction and is used before the last element in a list. In this case, this word should be substituted by a comma because <em>character reading</em> is not the last element on that list.</u>
3- </span><span>This week, though, a computer called Alpha Go <u>defeats</u> the world’s best player of Go. It did so by “ learning” the game, crunching through 30 million positions from recorded matches, reacting and anticipating. It <u>evolves</u> as a player and taught itself.
That single game of Go marks a milestone on the road to the “technological singularity”, the moment when artificial intelligence becomes capable of self-improvement and learns faster than humans can control or understand.</span><span>
<u>These should read defeated ... evolved. This continues the same line of thought on subject-verb agreement. If it's talking about a past event, and the rest of the paragraph sustains that idea, then these verbs should be in Simple Past.</u></span><span>
</span>
The main idea is the author purpose as a technique
Answer:
B. Virtual private network (VPN)
Explanation:
Answer:
This should help shouldnt it?
Explanation:
PART A: What does the interaction between the narrator and the priest in paragraph 5reveal?A.It reveals that the priest is empathetic and willing to share in the narrator’s grief.B.It reveals that the priest and perhaps others were already aware that thenarrator’s lover was unfaithful.C.It reveals that the narrator and his lover had been prominent, well-knownfigures in their community.D.It reveals that the narrator and the priest have a past history of negativity.4.PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A?A."and it seemed to me as if he were insulting her.” (Paragraph 5)B."nobody had the right to say that any longer, and I turned him out.” (Paragraph5)C.“Another came who was very kind and tender, and I shed tears when he spoketo me about her.” (Paragraph 5)D.“They consulted me about the funeral, but I do not remember anything that theysaid” (Paragraph 6)5.PART A: Which of the following best describes a theme of the story?A.It is important to remain devoted to our loved ones, even after they pass.B.While it may be painful, honoring the dead is an important practice to help copewith grief.C.Love can cause people to believe the best about others and often masks thetruth.D.The dead must remain as they are so that we can hold on to positive memoriesof them.5
