Answer:
The only time I believe it should be permissible for the rights of an individual to infringe on the rights of a group is when that group is doing any kind of wrongdoing such as harming another person, or a person's happiness or property. You shouldn't have any right to affect another's group rights or decision unless it causes harm or indirect harm.
Explanation:
I sure don't have time to write an essay! But the first one sounds alright.
One of the early Chinese civilizations was located between the two main rivers, (google them for more details) Anyways, unlike most of China, the plain between the two rivers is fertile, allowing the people to grow rice and other foods. Along with that, I am certain that they had mountains and deserts to the west. If they could be used against natural disasters (I doubt they'd come in west) it'd be helpful! Good day
The answer is - occupied with exploration.
While the Spanish still had problems with the Muslims and were giving their best to expel them, the Portuguese did not have problems of this type, so they were free to develop their economy and perform explorations. Because of the explorations Portugal made, they were able to find out new routes to the east, this meant free trade by their own terms, which led to increasing of the wealth of the country, and thus making it one of the most powerful countries in the world. Also because of their explorations, the Portuguese managed to get hold on to new territories and colonize them.
<span>The boundaries of eras are marked by great worldwide changes in </span>Life. What this means is that the way life forms work or exist changes drastically.
Answer:
The correct answer is Constitutional Provision.
Explanation:
FDR decided to expand the Supreme Court in 1937 in order to make it more efficient. Of course, critics came up saying that in this way the Supreme Court wouldn’t be against his New Deal, as it was before because them had unvalidated various important pieces of New Deal legislation justifying that the laws gave an unconstitutional amount of authority to the federal government. FDR proposed that every judge over 70 should retire and if they refused, an “subordinate” with complete voting rights was to be selected, in order to make sure that Roosevelt had a liberal majority. This was called by the opposites the “court-packing” plan.