answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saw5 [17]
2 years ago
7

Union troops continued to occupy Fort Sumter in 1860 because

Social Studies
2 answers:
Nesterboy [21]2 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is B) the United States had not officially recognized the right to secede.

Union troops continued to occupy Fort Sumter in 1860 because the United States had not officially recognized the right to secede.

Fort Sumpter was built in 1829 on an island located in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. Union troops occupied Fort Sumter in 1860 because the state of South Carolina had decided to secede from the Union. On April 12, 1861, President Lincoln troops were taking supplies to the Fort, Southern General P.G.T. Beauregard attacked the Fort. Union General Robert Anderson surrendered and the Confederates secured the Fort.

frozen [14]2 years ago
4 0

the United States had not officially recognized the right to secede

B

You might be interested in
"your poor planning led to this debacle" is an example of external attribution.
Pepsi [2]
<span>The statement that "Your poor planning led to this debacle" is an example of external attribution is false.
</span>External attribution<span> refers to inferring that situational factors are the cause of an event or behavior. 
</span>Poor planing is not a situational factor, but a factor that can be influenced.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An election system in which the entire state, or a region of the state, selects several representatives and the top vote-getters
ozzi
<span>Proportional Representation is an election system where the entire state or region of states select several representatives and the most voted representatives are awarded seats.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Gorkhas conquest on Kritipur on third attempt was the results of trick and treachery. prove the statement​
Anon25 [30]

Answer:

Gorkhas conquest on Kritipur on third attempt was the results of trick and treachery is described below in detail.

Explanation:

The Fight of Kirtipur happened in 1767 during the Gorkha triumph of Nepal and was confronted at Kirtipur, In 1767, the monarch of Gorkha sent his troops to invade Kirtipur a third time under the direction of Surpratap. In answer, the three emperors of Nepal combined strengths and sent their companies to support Kirtipur, but they could not remove the Gorkhas from their places.

4 0
2 years ago
A researcher wants to invite therapists to participate in small focus groups to discuss their perceptions regarding "troubled" a
nalin [4]

Answer:

The correct answer would be option A, Confidentiality of the individual subject's responses.

Explanation:

When a researcher invites a therapist to participate in a small focus group to discuss the perception about the troubled adolescent girls and the relationships they have with their parents. People usually don't discuss their such private problems in public and don't want to disclose their identity when discussing such problems on forums like focus groups where some therapist is present to listen to their problems. So confidentiality is a crucial concern in this. Instead of watching for the breach of confidentiality from the focus group participants, the researcher must focus on maintaining the confidentiality of the group members.

3 0
2 years ago
Now that you’ve worked with some predictions from both the past and present, what predictions would you make for the future? For
Darina [25.2K]

Answer and explanation:

Dear me,

If only you knew what life will be like thirty years from now - well, now for you. It is 2050, I'm obviously older, but I look and I feel much younger. Medicine these days is so advanced we are now aging more slowly. Several people are reported to live up to be 135 years old. It's not just medical advancements, but technology used everywhere has made us stronger, faster, healthier. The food and water we consume nowadays are modified, full of supplements that give us everything we need for a whole day in just one meal - that's right, we only eat once a day. Not to mention the adaptive clothes they came up with around 10 years ago. No matter the weather outside, whatever it is that we put on will provide us with the warmth and protection we need. People buy much fewer clothes than they did back in 2020, and no animals are used - or killed - to give us their fur or skin for fabric.

Speaking of animals and weather, the fight against climate change has done its job. It was a global effort, of course, but when all countries made the decision to embrace it, that frightening warming slowed down. Reforestation of the Amazon forest, for instance, was a difficult battle, but one worth fighting. Rivers, endangered species, forests, they were all finally regarded as essential for our lives on this Earth to continue, finally treated with the respect they deserve. Climate is now getting back to normal - as much as possible, that is. Fewer hurricanes and tornadoes, fewer storms... Now scientists are working to grow ice caps back in the Poles - that is something I'm curious about!

I work as a recruiter for a reforestation company - that's a thing now. But I don't really need to leave home to do my job. I can work from each and every room in my smart-house. There are holographic monitors everywhere, all activated via voice commands. They are like the computers I - I mean, you - used to use back in 2020. I can access the web and talk to co-workers, relatives, and friends anywhere. Their holograms simply pop out of devices installed around the house.

I do like to travel a couple of times a year, usually to foreign countries. Trips are cheaper and way faster now. Spain is just a half hour away, be it flying on a superjet or riding the underwater bullet train. During that short time, I either take a quick nap or write on my journal. By the way, we no longer write with our hands. There have developed devices that look like very small electrodes. They can be attached to the side of our heads and interpret our commands to write something down on our phones, watches, etc. We also don't need to read like we used to. Those same devices can send data into our brain in the form of electric signals. We just receive information as if we have read a newspaper, for instance. Scientists are now enhancing that device so that we can use it to control that system in our homes. When they perfect it, we will no longer have to use voice commands - a simple thought will suffice.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements about mountain ranges in the United States and Canada is false? A. The Piedmont region is the
    10·2 answers
  • How did Herbert Hoover earn the nickname The Great Humanitarian? A.) He successfully managed the distribution of food to Allied
    11·1 answer
  • . What is your evaluation of Margot’s plan for attaining happiness on the job?
    12·1 answer
  • Messner and tardiff's study using the routine activities approach found that ________.
    15·1 answer
  • Which description best illustrates an interest group's use of public pressure to indirectly influence policy?
    13·2 answers
  • Look at this detail from the central panel of the portinari altarpiece by hugo van der goes. match each of these elements with w
    9·2 answers
  • Achak is upset. He tells his roommate that if his psychology teacher knew how to teach, he would not have flunked his midterm. I
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be the best statement to use in a speech on volunteerism to create immediacy with an audience? a) t
    7·1 answer
  • If you answer ill give you brainliest.
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!