Answer:
learning effects
Explanation:
Learning effects: In economics, the term "learning effects" is described as the process through which specific education is considered as increasing productivity and therefore results in producing higher wages. It gives an insight to the company to develop some competitive advantage by decreasing some of the production costs. However, the employees are focused on working more efficiently, decrease in the number of wastes and defects on several products.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the leaning effects.
Answer:
The current ration for 2018 will be "1.55".
Explanation:
The given values are:
The total current assets of 2018 is:
= $310,000
The total current liabilities of 2018 is:
= $200,000
Now,
The current ratio of 2018 will be:
= 
On substituting the estimated values in the above formula, we get
= 
= 
Answer:
$700,000
Explanation:
As we know that
The income statement is the statement that records the income and the expenditure for a company
The expenses should be shown on debit side while the income or revenue is shown on the credit side
Since the total service revenue earned is $700,000 and the same is to be shown in the income statement as it records all the cash and credit sales or service revenue
Therefore, the total amount i.e $700,000 is reported on the income statement
Answer:
a. Borrow using short-term notes payable and use the cash to increase inventories.
Explanation:
The formula to compute the current ratio is shown below:
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
where,
The current assets = Cash and cash equivalents + Short-term investments + Accounts and notes receivable + Inventories + Prepaid expenses and other current assets
And, current liabilities would be
= Short-term obligations + Accounts payable
If the current ratio is 0.5 which means that the current asset is 1 and the current liabilities are 2 so the most appropriate option is a.
Answer:
From the given Matrix we can see that if videotech is selecting a high price, movietonia has a higher profit when it is charging a low price and this profit is 18. Similarly when videotech is selecting a lower price movietonia again has a higher profit when it is selecting a lower price which is 10. This indicates that movie tonia has a dominant strategy of selecting a low price.
If movietonia is selecting a high price videotech has a a higher pay off of 18 when it is selecting a low price. In case movietonia is selecting a low price videotech again has a higher profit when it is selecting a low price and this profi is 10.
Therefore videotech and movietonia both have dominant strategy of selecting a low price and this implies that low price, low price will be the Nash equilibrium.
In case the two firms are not colluding, both of them will choose a low price.
This is definitely an example of business dilemma game. The statement is true.
Explanation:
