by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
There's plenty of evidence in the story that arguments her point of view. The irony in "Story of an hour" is a good example of how women were treated and expected to behave. She was thought to be depressed and sad about his husband's death but she's actually happy and cheerful about the good news of his death. Although she feels joyful, she can't understand her feelings because she knows she's not expected to feel that way. Another good example is the ending, everyone thinks she died because of joy at seeing his husband alive but in fact, she may have died from a heart attack because her happiness only lasted for an hour. Society's expectations and pressures on women are still a present issue. Beauty standards, gender roles, and the fashion industry are just a little few examples of how society shapes women's lives. Social media, propaganda and the fashion industry show women of a certain race, age and body type. They just stick the beauty standards and these tell women how they should be in order to have beauty, but it doesn't encourage them to love themselves as they are.
Another example is the thought that a woman without a husband is miserable and incomplete. Her family thinks that he's destroyed because her husband should be her whole world but actually she doesn't care about being lonely at all, she just thinks about her freedom. The society's pressure for getting married has changed a bit but it differs in many countries and societies. However, it is still a present issue that women are not taken seriously when they said they won't get married or have children. They are thought has selfish because of having a different perspective and plan for their lives different from the one everyone expects them to follow.
The sentence that best credits the information from the site is the first example:
Bird expert Lee Sparks describes Harpy Eagles as "oddly attractive, yet insanely dangerous predators."
This is the best way to credit the information, because it gives the reader an idea of who Lee Sparks is, why his opinion is credible, and gives him credit for the words that were used directly from his article.
The correct answer of the given question above would be option A. The situation that could lead to a cultural misunderstanding is when a businessman shakes everyone's hands at an international conference. There are some people with cultures who have different interpretations when it comes to shaking one's hand. Hope this answer helps.
First of all I would like to describe what irony is, this techtique is employed by authors who what to expose and criticize corruption or any other topic (individual or social) by using exaggerations it is not to make people laugh but to warn people about something Swift used irony in those lines to show he incompetence of Ireland's politicians and how tyranny they could be.
The author Illustrates how the political system of Ireland works (only serving the Wealthy at the expense of the masses)
