Answer:
Order size = 50 cars
The number of orders=25
Explanation:
<em>The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is the order size that minimizes the balance of ordering cost and holding cost. At the EOQ, the carrying cost is equal to the holding cost. </em>
It is computed using the formulae below
EOQ = √ (2× Co× D)/Ch
Co- Ordering cost, Ch- Carrying cost - D- Annual demand
EOQ= √2× 1000× 1250/1000= 50
Number of cars to be ordered per time, i.e optimal order size= 50 cars
Order size = 50 cars
b)
The number of times orders should be placed per year would be calculated as follows:
The number of orders = Annual demand/ order size
The number of orders= 1250/50 = 25
The number of orders=25
A tradeoff is a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible feature. So the reasonable answer would be B
Answer:
Assume that a context switch takes T time. Suggest an upper bound (in terms of T) for holding a spinlock. If the spinlock is held for any longer, a mutex lock (where waiting threads are put to sleep) is a better alternative.
Explanation:
The top limit is to be twice the value of (2xT). Holding the spinlock for a longer time, it will be necessary to put the thread to sleep and get a context switch, so one process awakes the sleeping thread without the need of a second context switch.
In process synchronization, cooperating process can affect or be affected by other processes executing in the system, either directly share a logical address space, both code and data, or be allowed to share data only through files or messages, although concurrent access to shared data may result in data inconsistency. But there are several mechanisms to help the orderly execution of cooperating processes that share a logical address space, so that data consistency is kept.
Answer:
$30,000 excess
Explanation:
Beginning cash balance + Budgeted receipts - Budgeted disbursements + excess/deficiency = desired ending balance
$18,000 + $175,000 - $174,000 + $X = $49,000
$19,000 + $X = $49,000
$X = $49,000 - $19,000
$X = $30,000
Answer:
<h2>The answer in this case would be the last option in the answer list or options given in the question or falls equally on buyers and sellers in the short run but not the long run.</h2>
Explanation:
- In Microeconomics,elasticity level of supply usually has an inverse or negative relationship with the tax burden in the market.
- Therefore,higher elasticity of supply among the sellers or firms implies that they are relatively more sensitive or responsive to any price change in the market and would not be much willing to accept the burden of the tax which is reflected by an increase in the production cost of output or acceptance of a lower relative price for the output sold.
- Hence,the sellers or firms will reduce the quantity supplied of the output considerably in the market due to the tax imposition in the long run.Thus,even if the tax burden might be equally distributed among both the consumers/buyers and sellers/firms,the buyers/consumers will have a higher tax burden in the long run than the sellers/firms due to higher price elasticity of supply in the long run.
