Answer:
D). To persuade my audience that capital punishment fails to deter people from committing murder.
Explanation:
A purpose statement is described as a statement that primarily functions to define the topic and purpose of the speech or essay in a precise and compact manner. It reveals the key focus, direction, and objectives of the work that are going to be accomplished at the end.
As per the question, option D i.e. 'To persuade my audience that capital punishment fails to deter people from committing murder' reveals the purpose statement designed for a persuasive speech on a question of fact. <u>This would reveal the factual 'cause-and-effect'('capital punishment in preventing murders') direction that the speech would deal with. It would assist in establishing the credibility of the claim and convince the audience logically</u>. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
A. The plot must divert from the original components of a myth yet maintain a focus on its outcome.
Explanation:
I believe this is the best answer choice (though I may be wrong), since we can automatically eliminate answers, "C," and "D," since they don't really make much sense. The answer wouldn't be "B," since Aristotle doesn't necessarily say to have multiple surprises.
The answer that <span>best </span><span>describes why this is an example of inductive reasoning is A. It starts with details and uses them to support a more sweeping statement.</span>
