Answer:
Charlotte is befriended along the way by the old black cook, Zachariah, who eventually helps save her life. When the vengeful captain accuses her of murder, Charlotte is tried and found guilty. She escapes punishment in a life-and-death struggle with Jaggery and is finally reunited with her family.
Charlotte tells Captain Jaggery he reminds her of her father. ... Captain Jaggery warns Charlotte that she may see him say or do things that seem cruel, but that punishments are necessary to maintain order on the ship. He shows her his gun cabinet, and tells her that these are the only guns on the ship.
We can infer the following :
- Those men who gave their lives,did not die in vain""that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion-that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain (lines 18-21)""
- This war is betraying the ideals of the nation-he is saying that this war needs to come to a close.""lines 1 to 6: our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation,conceived in liberty and dedicated to the..."""
The complete question is:
Which closing sentences to a story best show a character reflecting on a larger meaning found in a conflict?
A. As a night person, i learned that i could never take a job working in a bakery because i would have to change in a way that is unacceptable to me.
B. I enjoyed getting up early in the morning and loved seeing the smiles i brought to the faces of those who enjoy bakery treats.
C. As an early bird who doesn't mind rising before dawn, i "got the worm" and found my true calling in life as a baker's apprentice.
D. I accepted a job in a bakery despite being a night owl and having to rise before dawn, but i learned that adaptability is often necessary to achieve one's goals.
Answer:
The correct option is D.
Explanation:
I accepted a job in a bakery despite being a night owl and having to rise before dawn, but i learned that adaptability is often necessary to achieve one's goals.
This is a closing sentences to a story that best show a character reflecting on a larger meaning found in a conflict.
The answer to the question is snow that burns
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
