<span>The correct answer would be D. Answer C neglects any opposing viewpoints, and is more of a closing sentence for the opposing argument generated in Answer D. Although the answers A and B throw Proposition S into a negative light, they do not themselves generate an opposing argument. Rather, they are just quick statements supporting the argument presented in answer D. D most sufficiently represents an opposing viewpoint as it acknowledges the other side of the argument, presents a statement that opposes this acknowledged argument, and follows with multiple supporting statements to strengthen the reasoning for opposing Proposition S. The passage continues to support this statement with: These city governments would be required to pay for public services in areas where local politicians have failed to find a way to fund their own projects. Approximately $12.3 million dollars of tax revenue would be redirected toward county projects. Many programs at our new community center will have to be cut. (Answer A)
*This would affect more than 40,000 citizens of Northfield. The construction of Northfield Park would probably have to be put on hold. (Answer B)
The passage closes with. What is good for Northfield is good for all of Westport County. (Answer C)
As these are just supporting statements for the argument presented in Answer D, or closing the letter, they cannot be the main opposing viewpoint being addressed. Therefore, they would be incorrect.</span>
Ani says that Dan Deluca wrote an article that contradicts his stance of the Nobel being well deserved at times, the two sentences of said article that show this kind of contradiction are:
Many of Dylan’s most fervently loved songs—some of which actually are love songs—date from the 1960s, and his being honored at age 75 can be seen as an ultimate affirmation for the baby boomer generation.
and
And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing.
this is because they say that the Nobel might be a product of simple nostalgia and they undermine Dylan as an artist, plus these seem to not be quotes from detractors but something Dan DeLuca is saying himself
The correct answer is; She learned the trait of patience on her quest to obtain the tiger's whisker.
Further Explanation:
Yun Ok had to wait 6 months to gain the trust of the tiger so that she could get a whisker. She had been having trouble reconnecting with her husband after he returned home from war. She did not care if it was dangerous going into the lions den as long as it brought back her husband.
She had to learn to be patient and trust the tiger to not hurt her. Most importantly, she had to gain the trust of the tiger. This took time and then she understood that she had to take time and have patience with her husband before things would return the way they once were at home.
Learn more about the story "The Tiger's Whisker" at brainly.com/question/13126761
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
Hobby for future
Hobby is a term referred to something that we do during our free time , but not many people know that hobbies can also be turned into a key for a better future .
When you keep on doing something you get better at it . For instance if your hobby is drawing and you do atleast one drawing a day then you will eventually get better at it . Just like that practise can make us achieve anything. But to get better at something doing only practise won't help , you should also try to get to the next level at it . For example if your hobby is drawing then the next level for you is oil pastel drawing , poster colour drawing then painting . Just that way improvements should be done . Studies are not the only way to achieve success . There are many ways , and one of them is doing our level best in the field we are interested.
In the article "How the Media Twists the News," Sheila Gribben Liaugminas explains that "intelligent news consumers" are those who pay attention to the ways in which media presents the news. She argues that being this intelligent consumer means that you realize that not everything you hear is valid, well-researched or unbiased. Moreover, an "intelligent citizen" employs this well-researched information to act in society. I believe that through the use of these two terms, the author makes a strong and valid call to action. She is effective when it comes to explaining that this is a vital task for all citizens. Moreover, she is explicit in how not doing so can affect our society and increase ignorance among the public.
