Answer:
a. Wolfgang will win, because this non-compete agreement is not reasonable.
Explanation:
A non-compete provision refers to clauses that prohibit or restrict the possibility that the employee will be re-employed in similar enterprises, within a certain radius or for a certain time, either in function identical to that occupied in the previous job or in another in which the acquired knowledge. may be used in whole or in part for the new functions. In the case shown in the above question, the non-compete provision imposed by ABC corp. Wolfgang demanded that Wolfgang not work for any recycling company in the New York state. This agreement is unreasonable as it covers a very large area. For this reason, Wolfgang will win the process. With this we can state that the correct answer to your question is the letter A.
Answer:
company
Explanation:
if the company fails to pay its debts it sides to it's own problems and who pays the debts
Answer:
if it is minimal levels they will let you go buy they will ask if someone can pick you up.
Explanation:
i could be wrong but that is what i have been told
