Answer:
C The author draws a comparison between the chemical transformation of Jekyll into Hyde and the real-life shift from ordinary person to evil-doer.
Explanation:
<u>The author tried to show the shift of people's morals into evil with the idea of how Jekyll and his chemical transformation into the evil Mr. Hyde.</u>
<u>Dr. Jekyll was trying to prove the duality of the people and their evil and good sides, but his experiment turned bad for him. In the end, he could not control his evil side anymore. </u>
<u>The author is trying with this to show how with doing more and more evil deeds normal person can shift into the evil-doer, and that there is no turning back. </u>
<u>There is no border anymore between good and the bad side</u>, a person can't just transform back, just as Jekyll couldn't control himself with chemicals anymore at the end.
Answer:
- The general will force Rainsford to participate in the hunt
- Rainsford will attempt to escape from the island
Explanation:
If you have read this book you know that Rainsford has a conflict with Zaroff after falling into the sea. This man gets his own island to hunt and is a brilliant sportsman who has developed an innovative type of hunting games. Their basic goal is to train people whose ships are wrecked because it gives them food and knives for a few days. After that, Zaroff begins to hunt them down so they need to survive to win this kind of strange game and stay alive. The worst part is that he kills them if he can find these poor men.
For this reason, based on this, we can conclude that the logical predictions that a reader can make based on the excerpt are:
- The general will force Rainsford to participate in the hunt
- Rainsford will attempt to escape from the island
Answer:
It provides a "single powerful spectacle" for the imagination's eye.
Answer:
2201 cypress way
madison, Wi
U. S. A
Dear mr Judge,
I heared about tom's conviction ,igot to know that you are charging him for man slauter that is ten years in prison. Below i am giving reason why you should change his conviction.
The murder commited was as an act of self defence, Tom was just trying to defend himslf while a person attempted to murder him.
Imagine a person trying to stab you with a knife. At that point please get that he was desperate to survive and i dont blame him for it. In the process of trying to escape he hit him with the head with a bottle,not with the intention to kill him but unfortunately for the.......... he did not survive.
Sir i hope you have a second thought. Tom does not deserve to go to jail.
Your's faithfully
Barrister Glamour.
Explanation:
While I cannot tell what is bolded, I can try to help.
A subtle distinction is a nuance.
A preference could be an inclination.
To condemn someone is like denouncing them.
Old fashioned could be quaint.
