Using the high-low method, separate each mixed expense into variable and fixed elements. State the cost formula for each mixed expense. (Omit the "£" sign in your response.)
<span>Shipping Expense: </span>
<span>(86,200 - 45,900) / (5,100 - 2,000) = £13 variable cost per unit </span>
<span>86,200 - (13 x 5,100) = £19,900 fixed cost </span>
<span>£ Y = £19,900 + £13 X </span>
<span>Salaries and Commissions </span>
<span>(238,400 - 114,400) / (5,100 - 2,000) = £40 variable cost per unit </span>
<span>238,400 - (40 x 5,100) = £34,400 fixed cost </span>
<span>£ Y = £34,400 + £40 X </span>
<span>3. </span>
<span>Redo the company’s income statement at the 5,100-unit level of activity using the contribution format. (Input all amounts as positive values except losses which should be indicated by a minus sign. Omit the "£" sign in your response.) </span>
<span>Frankel Ltd. </span>
<span>Income Statement </span>
<span>For the Month Ended June 30 </span>
<span>Sales revenue 912900 </span>
<span>Variable expenses: </span>
<span>Cost of goods sold 346800 </span>
<span>Shipping expenses 5,100 x 13 = 66,300 </span>
<span>Commissions 5,100 x 40 = 204,000 </span>
<span>Contribution margin 295,800 </span>
<span>Fixed expenses: </span>
<span>Fixed shipping 19,900 </span>
<span>Insurance expenses 9000 </span>
<span>Depreciation expenses 42700 </span>
<span>Sales salaries 34,400 </span>
<span>Advertising expenses 69200 </span>
<span>Net operating Income 120600</span>
I'm assuming you want to talk about accountants, that is a practitioner of accounting or accountancy. They do disclosure or provision of assurance about financial information. This in turn helps managers, investors, tax authorities and others make decisions
about allocating resource.
In the US licensed accountants are Certified Public Accountants (CPAs), or Public Accountants (PAs), this varies from state to state.
<span>The defendant seeks to offer into
evidence the fact that the mayor was convicted two years ago of taking a bribe
to award a city contract for solid waste disposal. Yes, this is a documentary evidence
and is admissible because the mayor is already proven convicted of corruption.</span>
Answer:
Rochelle
Explanation:
Because Rochelle oil company is safer than lionel because if there was a leak the damage would be very big.
