Answer:
1. How could the study group benefit Michel?
C. By generating more ideas
2.
It seems Michel might not grasp all of the key aspects of critical thinking. Which of the following is NOT a key aspect of critical thinking?
D. Agreeing with the majority opinion
3.
What is one question Michel should ask himself when presented with information in his history class?
A. Can this information be interpreted another way?
4.Which sentence from Michel’s paper is an example of a logical fallacy?
A. “The Boston Tea Party has become an iconic event in the history of the United States and is discussed in many American public school history classes.”
I think its:
But what else could we do? We could not give her those glib assurances that naive souls make so easily to others concerning their after state.
Answer:
The options are
Both include information that ask people to help children from Central America.
Both offer solutions that show how victims from other countries have been helped.
The excerpt from Enrique's Journey uses quotations to show that it is better for these children to be sent back, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses examples describing how other countries have dealt with the issue.
The excerpt from Enrique's Journey tells a story about what happened to one victim, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.
The answer is The excerpt from Enrique's Journey helps tells a story about what happened to one victim, and "Children of the Drug Wars" uses words that create an emotional response to persuade readers to take action.
