Answer:
Site B should be chosen based on the IRR criterion
Explanation:
Please check the attached image for the complete question
The internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested.
When comparing projects, the project with the highest IRR should be chosen.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
Inspection hours (h) = 10,000 hours per year
Total salaries (S) = $60,000
Cost of supplies (c) = $3 per inspection hour
Since there is no need for any inspection activity, all of the inspection costs qualify as nonvalue-added cost.
The nonvalue-added cost of inspection per year is $90,000
Answer:
There are many things that a company can do to institutionalise learning and knowledge. Some of them doesn't even cost much and take a lot of time to be implemented.
Empowerment of individual employees. Giving them more autonomy in the job and the capacity to work freely with the peers.
Making teams rather than working individually. Team spirit is essential in the learning process and to promote sharing.
Conducting internal development and training programs on a regular basis.
Using social media platforms to connect the employees so that they are able to share their knowledge, expertise on a real-time basis.
Reducing the power gap between the employees and their superiors.
Explanation:
Tina will react to the mixed evidence in a way that she will
likely become more firmly entrenched in regards with her attitude because of
the fact that she will believe on what she thinks she know is true or just than
the fact that she just obtained.
Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
