Answer:
a time relationship between the events in sentences 3 and 4
Explanation:
Kevin's paragraph is written in chronological order. He uses transition words to show the time relationship between the events throughout the paragraph. However, there is not a signal word that indicates how long after the workshop the family attended the workshop that the woman came to their house. The other options are not correct because the entire paragraph demonstrates the family's interest in helping animals. The connection between the family and woman is clear when it says that she came to their house. The last option is simply incorrect as well since a personal narrative is written in first person point of view.
Analogy is similarity between things.
In this case, an analogy is the last example - Apple is to tree as grape is to vine.
I'm kind of confused as to what is being asked.... but this is my best answer.
SOCIAL Prejudice, (maybe legal if we talk about the consequence to his actions)
why it cant be the others--->
racial ---- they say nothing about race here.
(MAYBE) legal----- from the passage, we can say that the guy is richhhhh, and he might be able to wave off the consequences of his murder. but then again you only analyze this passage so, probably not
environmental---- they don't mention the environment....
THE REASON WHY IT SHOULD BE SOCIAL- their social standings in this situation
-diamond ring (if thats what they mean by diamond ring finger, it could mean something else as well) only the rich can afford, a cane too
- hotel society gathering... (rich)
-poor Hattie Carroll could be literal as well.
I think my answer would be @ first law of thermodynamics i hope that work i need the answer now lbvvs.
Answer:
can leave
Explanation:
This makes the most sense.
Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D
