Answer:
The Ten Commandments can be described as a series of religious and moral ethics which are a moral foundation. The Ten Commandments are a part of the Covenant which are offered by God to the Israelite.
The Ten Commandments show ten actions of restraining which are forbidden by God upon mankind. Hence, the Ten Commandments generally require people to take refrain from certain actions.
Some of these actions are:
1) To abstain from associating partners with Him.
2) abstain from making of idols.
3) do not commit a murder of another person.
4) abstain from stealing.
5) do not bear false witness
6) do no covet
All these commandments show refrain.
The quote from animal farm is “four legs good, two legs
bad.” This expression, which happens in Chapter III, establishes Snowball’s
compression of the Seven Commandments of Animalism, which themselves function
as condensations of Old major’s inspiring speech on the need for animal harmony
in the face of human domination. The phrase requests one of the novel’s many
moments of propagandizing, which Orwell depicts as one instance of how the top
class misuses language to govern the minor classes.
<span>d.
“The economy of the United States is the largest national economy in the world. Its gross domestic product (GDP) was estimated as $14.3 trillion in 2008. The U.S. economy maintains a high level of output per person (GDP per capita, $46,800 in 2008, ranked at around number ten in the world).” - wikipedia.org
The actual material in all of the quotes could easily be used in her speech. However, the evidence in a speech should come from a reliable source. The source for the as option D is from a source that can be modified by anyone so it may not be accurate information.
</span>
Answer:
The machine is the place where every human being lives in an era that seems to be the future.
Explanation:
A typical day at the machine seems to be somewhat monotonous. The interactions with people are through technological devices and apparently the people here repeat their day to day.
Let's see the following lines:
<em>"She made the room dark and slept; she awoke and made the room light; she ate and exchanged ideas with her friends, and listened to music and attended lectures; she make the room dark and slept. Above her, beneath her, and around her, the Machine hummed eternally; she did not notice the noise, for she had been born with it in her ears. The earth, carrying her, hummed as it sped through silence, turning her now to the invisible sun, now to the invisible stars. She awoke and made the room light."
</em>
The only thing Vashti does is wake up, turn on the lights, interact with some of the thousands of buttons on the machine, talk virtually with friends and go back to sleep.
Here there is no direct interaction with nature or outside.
This question is about the article "American flag stands for tolerance"
Answer and Explanation:
Allen shows that he believes that an individual can present better ways to show his discontent with the government instead of disrespecting the national flag by burning it, with that, we can see that he does not agree with the Supreme Court's decision to allow the burning of flags is a fair protest against the government, but quickly Allen claims that the Supreme Court is correct in allowing this, since even presenting a form of disrespect, the burning of flags is part of a peaceful protest, in addition to allowing freedom of expression in the country.
This shows that Allen's arguments are based on the country's ethical and legal standards and not on his own opinions, or on the sentimetalism he may feel for national symbols. He addresses the counterargument as a justification as to why he should not evaluate the Supreme Court's permission, but rather support it. This can be seen through the paragraph:
<em>"The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations [...] iven the widespread and deeply felt reverence for this symbol of what we perceive to be the best of our civilization, what is the harm in insisting upon a modicum of respect for it? [...] Any messages that burning the flag might convey easily can be communicated in other ways. </em>
<em>The Supreme Court was not wrong. Indeed, a decision contrary to the one reached would have been a definitive step away from our national aspirations. A commitment to the intertwined freedoms of conscience and expression is at the core of those aspirations. What most distinguishes our civilization from both its predecessors and its contemporary competitors is a belief in the sanctity of the human conscience. Each individual is to have the freedom to develop by his or her own lights, and not by the command of officialdom. That requires not just the right to be let alone, but also the right to communicate with, to learn from and test views in conversations."</em>
