Literature and the Holocaust have a complicated relationship. This isn't to say, of course, that the pairing isn't a fruitful one—the Holocaust has influenced, if not defined, nearly every Jewish writer since, from Saul Bellow to Jonathan Safran Foer, and many non-Jews besides, like W.G. Sebald and Jorge Semprun. Still, literature qua art—innately concerned with representation and appropriation—seemingly stands opposed to the immutability of the Holocaust and our oversized obligations to its memory. Good literature makes artistic demands, flexes and contorts narratives, resists limpid morality, compromises reality's details. Regarding the Holocaust, this seems unconscionable, even blasphemous. The horrors of Auschwitz and Buchenwald need no artistic amplification.
Answer:
* Break big, complex ideas down into simple, concise sentences
* Incorporate cartoons, as they often appeal to small children.
Explanation:
The correct answer is this one: "1)They are lovers who are meeting in secret." The excerpt from the poem "The Solitary Reaper" by William Wordsworth, can be determined about the speaker and the singing solitary reaper is that t<span>hey are lovers who are meeting in secret because of some circumstance.</span>
D. Would you be interested in a discount in exchange for filling out this survey?
