answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet-ann [11.9K]
2 years ago
9

A strict constructionist would interpret the Constitution _____.

History
2 answers:
yawa3891 [41]2 years ago
7 0
<span>C) exactly as it was written in the text</span>
astra-53 [7]2 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is C. A strict constructionist would interpret the Constitution exactly as it was written in the text.

Strict constructionism refers to a particular way of interpreting the Constitution and the laws of the United States. When used in a legal environment, it means that a judge must interpret the text as written, and not draw any consequence from it. Sometimes it is confused with "originalism," strict constructionism concentrates more on the text and less on the times when it was written. Its opposite, the broad interpretation of the Constitution, infers Congress powers or individual rights that are not expressly recognized in it. Sometimes called judicial activism, this was denounced by the opposition as an attempt by the activist courts to create legislation from the bench, usurping the legislative power.

You might be interested in
In what real-life scenarios do you see Machiavelli's advice playing out, either positively or negatively?
ratelena [41]

Answer:

Machiavelli's was born on may 3,1469.He was an Italian politician,philosopher ,writer and a writer.He wrote his most famous work' The Prince' in 1513.

<u>Explanation:</u>He represented various <u>negative thoughts</u> especially in his famous book 'The Prince'.He <u>propagated immoral behavior.</u>According to him a person need not follow moral values in real life.He considered dishonesty  and killing those who are innocent being normal and effective especially in politics.

In his book 'The Prince'.He stressed that a Prince must not only be concerned with his reputation ,but he must  learn to act immorally at right times.It is not bad to be immoral for achieving our objectives.Many readers considered Machiavelli's teachings as evil.

In real life scenario Machiavelli's advice will play a <u>negative role.</u>It will enable every person to act for his selfish motive.It will help  bad people to maintain their power by following dishonest means and becoming cruel towards innocent and honest people.This will cultivate evil in the society.People will forget about their ethics and will become brutal.So according to me Machiavelli's advice should not be implemented.

6 0
2 years ago
Which scenario would most likely take place under Athens’ jury system?
katrin [286]

Answer:

A random selection of 500 citizens to make up a jury

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the author’s depictions of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin. What do these depictions reveal about these hist
Vinvika [58]

Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin

Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.

  • Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
  • Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
  • Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
  • Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant  torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
  • The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.

Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.                  

4 0
2 years ago
What is a third party?
masya89 [10]
The answer is C.

A third party is a political party that is created as an alternative to the major parties in a two party system.

A good example is the US Green Party. The Green Party is an alternative to the Democratic and Republican Party.

Hope this helps!
4 0
2 years ago
How did the need to interact with the environment lead to advances in civilization?
zheka24 [161]
<span>It led to the development of technology to solve problems and organization to implement solutions.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what ways did British actions before the revolution lead to the second, third, and fourth amendments
    10·1 answer
  • Which action is an example of the government pursuing a fiscal policy?
    5·2 answers
  • Which characteristics shaped society and culture in the Maurya empire under Asoka’s rule?
    6·2 answers
  • What happened as a result of the destruction of the uss maine?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statements best account for the success of Muslim invasions in northern India select all that apply
    14·1 answer
  • What was a common belief among historians in the early 20th century that makes their sources biased?
    14·2 answers
  • Which word best describes Tsar Nicholas II?
    13·2 answers
  • What is obsidian, and how was it incorporated into mesoamerican culture
    8·1 answer
  • Oh! Maude! How can you want to be a surgeon? I should die if I saw a man cut up and mangled; but you are a marvel!
    5·2 answers
  • The poster shows strategies to convey excitement
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!