Dave should have known the person was a minor, or did not ask for proof of age when he should have. this is called

2 answers:

4 0

This is the NEGLIGENCE on the part of Dave. If he sold alcohol to the minor, Dave can face the charges of criminal negligence. If it was a property contract, or anything similar to that, then Dve will be charged under civil negligence. He will face the charges even what he did was not intentional.

mars1129 [50]2 years ago

3 0

Dave's actions can be considered as negligence. It is because he fails to do his responsibilities like how he didn't know that the person was a minor, he could have sold him things that are not appropriate in his or her age, like for example, alcohol. In Dave's actions, he could face serious consequences, worst, he could be imprisoned.

You might be interested in

The peptide ___10_____ is released during periods of food deprivation and _____11_____ before a meal and _____12_____ after a me

zysi [14]

10 dopamine

11 decreases

12 increase

D lepton

6 0

2 years ago

My measurement for wedding dress are bust 46 waist 45 hips 51 hollow hem 51 what size do i get

jenyasd209 [6]

All depends on the store you are getting it from, ask for their size guide/chart and check

6 0

2 years ago

How has hinduism prevented modern social mobility?

kirill [66]

Hinduism prevented modern social mobility because it is designed to be religion of society and civilization, rather than of individual. Hinduism covered aspects of specific role to certain person out of free their free will.

Hope my answer would be a great help for you.
If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is one explanation for the dramatic rise in the typical ages of entering marriage and parenthood today in developing countr

Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

Private Acceptance

Explanation:

Private acceptance is an attitudinal alteration usually not expressed in deeds, action and words in public as it explains and espouses informational social consent, amounting to influence of the cognition to accept the influence of a group of norm in changing ones behavior. It differs from public compliance , which can be seen as superficial and can be seen as transient or transitionary change in behavior as a result of coercion and social influence.

8 0

2 years ago

Growing up, eric was always favored over his sister by his parents. if this unequal treatment leads to differences in the childr

Bogdan [553]

In the given scenario, it is considered to be an unequal treatment in which will likely lead to the children’s differences in their personality that is an example of a non-shared environmental factor because they are not treated the same and that they don’t share the same environment or experience.

5 0

2 years ago