Answer:
I think its A
Explanation:
because transform boundaries make earthquakes and rift ocean ridges are oceanic
Answer:
Andrew Carnegie was extremely wealthy having built a personal fortune from steel. He was a philanthropist and believed in giving back to the community but he still maintained control of where and how to donate. The kind of projects he prioritized did little to directly help the class of people who struggle daily like coal miners.
Explanation:
Andrew Carnegie was known as a philanthropist, he felt it was his duty or obligation to give back to the community as a wealthy person. But he was also the wealthiest man in the world in 1901 when he retired. There is a big disparity between his life and the life of average coal miner who had to struggle in the mines and risked their health and lives because the earnings were a bit higher than other options for the poorer or working class at the time, particularly where there was coal mining in the Appalachians and around Pittsburgh, for example. This philanthropic view was not ethical because it was the wealthy man himself who still decided where the money was to be donated or invested and in the kind of services it would provide. Carnegie donated to museums and libraries in the Pittsburgh area for example, and while valuable in themselves they do little to improve the quality of life for working class people directly, like coal miners. Although Carnegie did respond personally to some families in the Harwick Mine Disaster for example, having medals privately minted for the families of two miners who gave their lives trying to save the others. Carnegie also gave $5 million to establish a Carnegie Hero Fund (note how the gesture was branded in the sense even in giving it carries the Carnegie name). But 181 people died in that accident that was indicative of other sacrifices many countless other coal miners made to help amass his personal fortune.
Answer:
I think the central idea of the passage is that the family Otzi's father is common in Europe.
Explanation:
My justification for my answer is that his DNA kind of matched the one of the people living in the Neolithic Age. This shows that maybe he was a descendant of those people.
I think the first answer is wrong because people of the Neolithic Age were from the past and I don't think DNA existed by then.
And the think the second is wrong because his mother's family was just rare it wasn't complex.
Finally the last is wrong because the DNA wasn't so hard to test it was also easy to compare it because there were other samples to be compared with.
That leaves us with the last answer as correct.
HOPE IT HELPED
The answer is D.
<span>If a meeting served a social rather than a task function, the type of meeting would be a ritual activity. A social meeting is classified to a ritual activity. A ritual activity is a series of activities that includes words, gestures, and objects that are done in an appropriate place, and done in relation to set of a sequence.</span>
By suggesting that she keep a behavior log to determine the cause of this inner guilt.
by asking her to free associate to other situations that led to this feeling.
by helping her tolerate this inner guilt rather than trying to get rid of it.
<span>by challenging her statement and explaining why it is irrational to feel guilty.</span>
