Answer:
C The author draws a comparison between the chemical transformation of Jekyll into Hyde and the real-life shift from ordinary person to evil-doer.
Explanation:
<u>The author tried to show the shift of people's morals into evil with the idea of how Jekyll and his chemical transformation into the evil Mr. Hyde.</u>
<u>Dr. Jekyll was trying to prove the duality of the people and their evil and good sides, but his experiment turned bad for him. In the end, he could not control his evil side anymore. </u>
<u>The author is trying with this to show how with doing more and more evil deeds normal person can shift into the evil-doer, and that there is no turning back. </u>
<u>There is no border anymore between good and the bad side</u>, a person can't just transform back, just as Jekyll couldn't control himself with chemicals anymore at the end.
Had to look for the missing details and here is my answer.
"For the Union Dead" is actually a book that was written by Robert Lowell. This book composes of a collection of poems. And based on the excerpt given taken from this book, what the author wants the reader to recognize as based on the start and end is that the Colonel Shaw's monument would be one day be destroyed and forgotten. Hope this helps.
C. In Beowulf his thoughts are clearly explained but in Grendel his thoughts are vague.
In Thomas Hardy's <em>Hap</em>, the speaker ponders about how it would be more bearable to think that all of his misfortunes happen because a greater power has decided so, than the <em>reality </em>(by his perspective) which is that his <em>bad luck </em>in life was a result of random chance and unfortunate coincidence.
Because of his ponderance, we could say that this poem shows a reflective speaker. While some people think that this shows a pessimist thinker, Hardy was known for his realistic vision of life.
Therefore, your best answer is reflective.
