Answer:
Both of these essays are based on personal commentary and have a straight forward writing style.
Explanation:
Shooting An Elephant is an excellent heart-wrenching narration written by George Orwell. While Back To My Own Country is a thought-provoking essay written by Andrea Levy. These pieces of literature elaborate on a similar theme as well. They talk about social colonial evils.
George emphasizes on heinous animal cruelty and exemplifies elephants as generous beings. He also sheds light on British imperialism.
Andrea Levy talks about social injustice committed against the black people. She also describes the general air of Britain during the 1500s - 1800s. According to her, black people contributed a lot to Modern Britain.
The poet states that the statue had been destroyed and what were left was its leg and head. But in contrast to that the picture has a full statue with the entire body. Also the poet has stated that the face has a permanent frown due to ordering always, but here it does not seem to be. So therefore that is the one detail not clearly shown by the poet.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
I just took the quiz and here are the correct answers for your question!
(2) Students should have vision tests before they can operate motor vehicles.
(3) Driving classes should add instruction about the dangers of texting and driving.
(5)Behind-the-wheel courses ought to include driving time on local highways.
