First find how many units of solution there is:
500* 2% = 500(.02) = 10 units
You need 10 units of solution in 'x' units of a 10% solution.
x*10% = 0.1x = 10 units -----> x = 10/0.1 = 100
100 units are needed
Answer:
1. <u>$14.88</u>
2. <u>$12.40</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
An english translation:
<em>A company transports office cabinets to a location 425km away. Its cost is R $ 2.10 per km traveled. When the cabinets are assembled, the vehicle's capacity is 60 units. When they are disassembled the capacity increases 6 times. We ask: 1- What is the cost per assembled cabinet? 2- What is the savings per cabinet, when these are taken apart.</em>
<em />
<u>Solution:</u>
425 km with 2.10 per km means:
425 * 2.10 = $892.50 total cost
Now, when assembled, there goes 60 cabinets, so cost per assembled cabinet is:
<u>Cost per assembled cabinet = 892.5/60 = $14.875 = $14.88</u>
<u></u>
The capacity of 60 after disembling, it becomes:
60 * 6 = 360
So, cost per cabinet becomes:
892.5/360 = <u>$2.48</u>
The savings is how much you save up if they were assembled:
14.88 - 2.48 = <u>$12.40</u>
<u>Savings = $12.40</u>
Answer:
1.4 × 10^-8
Step-by-step explanation:
The chip is 14 nanometers
14 * .000000001
.000000014
Move the decimal 8 places to the right, because we need 1 number in front of the decimal for scientific notation. The exponent will be -8 because we moved it 8 places to the right
1.4 × 10^-8
Answer:
H0 ; μ ≤ 4 pCi/L
Ha ; μ > 4 pCi/L
The null hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is less than or equal to the safe level of 4pCi/L
H0 ; μ ≤ 4 pCi/L
The alternative hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is greater than the safe level of 4pCi/L.
Ha ; μ > 4 pCi/L
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis (H0) tries to show that no significant variation exists between variables or that a single variable is no different than its mean. While an alternative Hypothesis (Ha) attempt to prove that a new theory is true rather than the old one. That a variable is significantly different from the mean.
The null hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is less than or equal to the safe level of 4pCi/L
H0 ; μ ≤ 4 pCi/L
The alternative hypothesis is that the concentration of dangerous, cancer-causing radon gas in her classroom is greater than the safe level of 4pCi/L.
Ha ; μ > 4 pCi/L
