The statement reports the investment's value has gone up. That is inconsistent with a negative rate of return, which would mean the value has gone down.
No, the reported rate of return does not seem reasonable.
Answers:
A) △ACF ≅ △AEB because of ASA.
D) ∠CFA ≅ ∠EBA
E) FC ≅ BE
Solution:
AC ≅ AE; ∠ACD ≅ ∠AED Given
The angle ∠CAF ≅ ∠EAB, because is the same angle in Vertex A
Then △ACF ≅ △AEB because of ASA (Angle Side Angle): They have a congruent side (AC ≅ AE) and the two adjacent angles to this side are congruent too (∠ACD ≅ ∠AED and ∠CAF ≅ ∠EAB), then option A) is true: △ACF ≅ △AEB because of ASA.
If the two triangles are congruent, the ∠CFA ≅ ∠EBA; and FC ≅ BE, by CPCTC (Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent), then Options D) ∠CFA ≅ ∠EBA and E) FC ≅ BE are true
Answer: $1935.56
Step-by-step explanation:
T.P=R.P-(12% of R.P)
R.P=$77.30 per 1m²
When m =5.35, m²=5.35²=28.6225
R.P= $(77.30×28.6225)
R.P=$2212.52
12.5% of R.P=0.125×$2212.52=$276.565
Therefore,
T.P = $2212.52-$276.565 = $1935.96
Note: T.P is Trade Price and R.P is Retail Price.
Hope this helps?
Answer:
None of the equations are true for p = 3.4
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for the inequality to be valid we need to apply the value for p and check wether or not it is true. We gonna do for each of the following:
A. 3p < 10.2
3*3.4 < 10.2
10.2 < 10.2
Not true, since the left side is equal to the right side and not less.
B. 13.6 < 3.9p
13.6 < 3.9*3.4
13.6 < 13.26
Not true since 13.6 is greater than 13.26
C. 5p > 17.1
5*3.4 > 17.1
17 > 17.1
Not true since 17 is less than 17.1
D. 8.5 > 2.5p
8.5 > 2.5*3.4
8.5 > 8.5
Not true since the left side is equal to the right side.
