Biodiversity increases as the number of populations grow, because a greater population generally means a more diverse one.
However, this is not always true, so I'm not sure what answer they're looking for.
Answer:
C- it help to show that some bacteria are just one cell.
Explanation:
Anton Leeuwenhoek was the first scientist who observed the presence of bacteria in his tooth scratch under the microscope made by himself. At that time there was no concept of bacteria and he named those small creatures as animalcules which were later termed as bacteria.
Leeuwenhoek during 1670s sent the details of his experimentation on algae and bacteria to Royal Society of London.
It was due to his that primitive experiment that made the discovery of bacteria and make it known to other scientists. Therefore option C is the best option that demonstrates that bacteria are single celled organisms that are very minute. When we look at cell theory there is a postulate that shows that cell is the fundamental unit of function and structure of all living organisms. So, the work of Anton Leeuwenhoek holds substantial importance in the formulation of cell theory.
Hope it helps!
<span>Both require that DNA be manipulated in some way.</span>
Answer:
b. Foraging birds eat left over rice and trample the ground making trilling unnecessary.
Explanation:
The California ricelands Habitat Partnership is a partnership between rice farmer and conservation group that will promote long term sustainability of wetland species.
This farming method is beneficial to both the farmers and the species. The wetland species such as foraging birds will benefit by coming to eat the left over rice after the farmers have harvested the rice.
As the birds eat the rice, they trample the grounds making trilling unnecessary hence benefiting the rice farmers.
Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
